Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #310
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- KuzIII0
The problem is, if homo sapien possessed the full cognitive potential that he does today, it is rediculous to posit that he existed for over 100,000 years with essentially no progression except for primitive tool construction.
discipler
(Jan 6 06, 05:19)OMG, You're not that stupid are you??? did you read my post???
look, you idiot
"The killer application that led to humanity's rise is easy to identify. It is agriculture. When the glaciers began to melt and the climate to improve, several groups learned how to grow crops and domesticate animals. Once they had done that, there was no going back. Agriculture enabled man to shape his environment in a way no species had done before"
The neolithic revolution coincided with the end of the ice-age. it wasn't about mental capacity it was about certain environmental conditions that were met.
Look at the analogy i made you fucking idiot - look at the amazing technological advances that have been made in the last 200 years with the onset of the industrial revolution and the shift from feudal to capitalist societies. For 10,000 years the world changed little from an agrarian system based on feudalism to what we see today. Yet the cranial capacity of the homo sapien has changed very little. Does this mean, by your idiotic logic that men could not have existed until 200 years ago?
really, how stupid are you?
plus what about the point i made, this one:
"plus you are undersestimating the potential of pre-neolitihic man who produced vastly complicated and sophisticated tools, as well as art and music. you should also note that there are societies out there who practice a prehistoric form of hunting-gathering, and have not seen it necessary to adapt to the agricultural methods of 7-10,000 years ago, or the industrial methods of 200 years ago"
don't be a dumbass dicklpler, your argument is stupid and holds no water. it only convinces monkeys and children.,