Intelligent? Design

Out of context: Reply #139

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 391 Responses
  • nessdog0

    His argument hinges on the notion of "irreducibly complex systems," systems that could not function if they were missing just one of their many parts. "Irreducibly complex systems ... cannot evolve in a Darwinian fashion," he says, because natural selection works on small mutations in just one component at a time. He then leaps to the conclusion that intelligent design must be responsible for these irreducibly complex systems.

View thread