Intelligent design

Out of context: Reply #605

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 690 Responses
  • discipler0

    nonsense, spifflink. ID is following scientific evidence where it leads, rather than restricting it to Methodological Naturalism. The articles I link come from proponents of ID, so what? Either they contain factual data, or they do not.

    What I am in favor of is having America's children be taught that biological systems demonstrate purposeful design - no getting around this. And that Darwinian Evolution is antiquated science with more holes than a wheel of swiss cheese.

    Teach kids truth, not steamboat era science.

View thread