KING KONG
KING KONG
Out of context: Reply #43
- Started
- Last post
- 121 Responses
- KuzII0
fools who don't know their history.
It was clearly 1950s. Can't you tell by the cars you uneducated fools????
What did people think about the racial elements with the civilised Europeans going into the world of the savage faceless black people. Suppose he hadded to keep some of the less digestable attitudes of the original 1930s films, plus the tokenistic black sailor he introdueced. Was that meant to make up for it? And fer fucks sake, what was that ridiculous "side-story" with the black sailor and that white kid jimmy? that was so pointless it was without a point.
Overall i enjoyed the film.