intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #359
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
ukit, let's look at the actual situation now. Since you've painted a fairy tale scenario. You see, if you google enough, you'll find plenty of sites with skewed information designed to misrepresent and thus discredit. And this demonstrates how threated the Darwinian fundamentalists are by the growing ID movement.
1. Discovery institute is one of many organizations promoting ID. You also have ARN, http://www.iscid.org/, and a host of blogs and research centers by various other independant scientists. Again, this argument demonstrates dodging the real issue - the science.
2. You ignore what i just posted. It is NEW science and is just now gaining exposure in peer reviewed publications and is just now being organized into a curriculum. So, more and more scientists are taking it seriously as they, and this is key, as they become EDUCATED about it.
3. Dawkins and Hawkings have an epistemological axe to grind. They are philosophical atheists and Dawkins especially is on a crusade to stop the spread of ID. Why? Again, because of his religious bias.
Additionally, you have the dizzyingly brilliant minds of William Dembski, Michael Behe, Stephen Meyer, Jonathan Wells, etc... who are equal intellectually with Dawkins (as if that mattered when you factored in philosophical bias).