intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #342
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- deep_throat0
nope. what you're STILL missing is that Conway's universal turing machine demonstrates the need for a programmer a
---------------------------
omg, you've been trying to look up websties on conway for two days now, and THIS is all you can come up with????The ONE single programming rule required in Conway's game is one that dictates whether a dots lives or dies. the universe is FULL of such ruels - about whether a star lives or dies, or whether life lives or dies. From such simple rules complexity occurred. It matters not that Conway "programmed" his game so he can observe how different rules function, interact, and grow into complexity.
"Dots on a screen can be observed with one's eyes. Irreducibly complexity in biological systems or the building blocks of organic life, cannot be observed to generate themselves from non-matter. hehe
discipler
(Oct 2 05, 11:01)"Of course they can't! That's the whole point! I'll say this slowly:
THe life game is a model that that helps to observe what a simple rule based system will do if time is speeded up to an observable degree. Just to observe what the patterns do.
Man, you really have difficulty holding abstract thought in your head. No wonder you're a total jesus boy.