intelligent design

Out of context: Reply #336

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 383 Responses
  • discipler0

    nope. what you're STILL missing is that Conway's universal turing machine demonstrates the need for a programmer and that design most certainly cannot simply "occur" in irreducibly complex biological systems. It cannot and does not. And I'm still not sure why you keep bringing up thermodynamics which simply, in essence demonstrates that everything is moving towards decay and disorder - energy wears down. This is a law, by the way, not a theory. So, I suppose it even more demonstrates that Conway's model is only truly effective as what it is - a hypothetical computer program.

    Dots on a screen can be observed with one's eyes. Irreducibly complexity in biological systems or the building blocks of organic life, cannot be observed to generate themselves from non-matter. hehe

View thread