intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #317
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
"deep throat", this "debate" will end as all past discussions with you have, me ignoring you because you are crass (to say the least) and clearly, not terribly bright.
I'll disregard your alleged quote where you inserted things i never said, (or just quoted someone else), and I'll just drive home a final point for the thinking folks here:
Conway's game of Life is able to represent a Universal Turing Machine (a computer that is able to run any program). The problem is that UTMs need to be programmed.
(-gratuitous pause to let that sink in-)...
And where does the program come from?
(-2nd gratuitous pause to let it sink in-)...
This falls under what is called the typical "free lunch" fallacy. For specifics on this fallacy, read chapter 4 in Dr. William Dembski's aptly titled book, "No Free Lunch".
And again, to find out why this has no value in the realm of biochemistry as pertaining to the "development"of organic life, just read 20 or 30 of my other posts. :)
g'bye deep throat.