intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #284
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
kuz, you are a master at twisting what people say and arriving at an imaginary scenario where you think you've "pinned them against the wall". I think that any thinking person who's been observing this thread will be able to clearly see the flaws in your "steamroller" approach. Let me take you down a notch or two, once again...
I fully understand the mathematical model of Conway's wherein you can have imaginary simplicity move to imaginary complexity. It's a simple model indeed. And what i have demonstrated is that this model has no bearing on irreducibly complex biological life. And we know this as a fact. Because the only un-intelligent mechanism available as an option to produce molecular machines, is Darwin's natural selection working with random mutation. And this has been showed to fail the test because natural selection prevents the necessary components of the fundamental building blocks of life, to come together (from simplicity) and create complexity. Again, these machines require all their constituent parts at once, to function. Indicating an instant in time where a design was actively put into place.
So, I see your point about the mathematical model. My counter point was to demonstrate how it has no bearing on what science observes in the realm of biochemistry and bioengineering. i.e. the core of all life.