intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #279
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- veraicon0
Tick said:
__________For our human existence/brains this workks. On a quantum level time might not even have a direction, and some physicists are postulating (and seeking proof) that time doesn't even exist...so if in fact time isn't linear there is no nedd for a "first causer"
my answer to this:
ha ha ha ha ha ha. and i suppose you are sooo beyond human that you got your brain around this bend, even though scientists hardly even know enough about the human brain?
pleeeeeassssse.
really, all i ever stated was that since we will never know, as humans ( tick if far beyond that), how the universe really came to be we will always have the same damn agrument.
forever scientists will TRY to prove how the first molecules came to be and forever there will be doubt because of the lack of proof. which leads us to this thread and this ever lasting argument...
that's it. there is nothing to even debate here. science is based upon theories... some become facts, others don't. some that are thought to be fact are later proven to be wrong. that's it.
i personally don't believe most humans...as they think they know too much.
so:
again, some believe there is once science and darwin and evolution and that's it.
others believe that science makes lots of mistakes and has not and never will dig up what really makes this universe tick.
yet others believe that there is a GOD that created all of this.
the three will never see eye to eye and never have.... so why ever talk about it???
so i guess there IS A NEED for the so called "first causer" , as tick puts, for the small mind of human beings since this thread exists.
xo