intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #264
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- deep_throat0
no discipler, i'm mentioning it. Because i'm trying to point out a simple model to you.
Your impossibilty to understand that computer models reflect ideas of what life is and how it can come about and become infinitley complex shows definiciney in your imagination.
YOU were talking about your ideas of 2nd laws of thermodyanmics becaouse YOU (if you read back what you said) were talking about the transferrence of infromation
I proved to you with a very simple computer model, that information can be transferred by self-organisin mechanisms, as demonstrated by the life game.
That was the one theory of yours i was attacking and debunking.
You then, ofcourse, changed the topic to "what scientists are now observing".
You failed ot see my point delieberatly.