intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #228
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
Incorrect on several counts, deep throat. First off, making shots at my intelligence level merely demonstrates that you are intimidated. It certainly doesn't make you appear any brighter. Secondgly, a great majority of I.D. scientists and theorists posit that everything was programmed by the designer to unfold a certain way. And the majority of I.D. theorists and proponents that i've met are agnostic. So, you make unwarranted assumptions. Furthermore what the information that you are not privy to, yet speak about as though you had it nailed down, is principles of self organization. When you actually study the biochemistry behind molecular life, you quickly find out that the core irreducibly complex machines (like the ceel) DO NOT self organize. This is an assumption from silence by naturalists. Finally, Astrophyisics and cosmology has demonstrated clearly the uniqueness of our position and laws of physics which demonstrate the need for a designer. These are set to an impossible tolerance. So, given the hugeness of our expanding universe, we are still at an incredibly unlikely scenario with the fine tuning of our laws.