intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #174
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
1. There is no infinity of universes. This is not even a theory, it's an exotic notion to avoid the design inference. It's properly called the "multiverse" idea.
2. Our planet and the relevant laws are physics are perfectly fine-tuned to support organic life. This supports the notion that there is a designer behind it.
3. I can't believe you actually said that about going farther and farther back. This is called an infinite regression of causes and yes, they will continue going back until you arrive at an uncaused-first-cause. Again, points to an eternal causal entity.
4. Physicists have concluded that the game of life does not resemble what we know about life at the sub atomic level. 1. The game of life generator had an intelligent entity as it's author. 2. No one has produced a working computer in the real world by drawing a pattern and pressing "go" in the real world and if they did, they would be the intelligent causal entity.
So, if I follow Conway's reasoning, I'm required to have a designer draw up and establish the rules and then press the go button. So, thanks for helping illustrate my point.