intelligent design

Out of context: Reply #156

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 383 Responses
  • discipler0

    If you want to talk mathematics and probabilites, your man is MIT mathematician, Dr. William Dembski. He demonstrates clearly how non cognizant materials do not and never have produced organic life spontaneously.

    http://www.designinference.com/d…

    http://www.designinference.com/d…

    He demonstrates the impossible probabilities involved. It's important to note that science, even under the manipulation of intelligent entities, has never produced irreducibly complex organisms.

    People can speculate on exotic theories of pansperma and multiverses as long as they want to. It only demonstrates the desperation that people will go to get away from the theistic implications of design. And these theories only end up pushing the issue of origins back a step and end in a infinite regression of causes (really effects).

    Information (as in DNA) has only been produced by intelligent entities. The same goes for the molecular machines we see in irreducibly complex organisms. Once cannot escape the smell of design here.

View thread