intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #121
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
No, bot. That's just the kind of nonsense that so many believe and need to be educated about. We have absolutely no record of how the first cell formed! It's nonsense to say we do. Your description fails... here's why:
We know now that cells are impossibly complex powerhouses of machinery containing information transport systems, error protection mechanisms, transport shuttles, etc... Now here's the kicker that demonstrates why they didn't just "form - irreducibility. What this means is, if you remove any one miniscule component, the entire cell fails. This means that it requires all of it's constituent parts at the same time to function or else it's useless. Darwinian gradualism would not build this because: A) The mechanism has no way of generating the intelligence to produce such complex systems and B) Natural Selection would prevent the components from coming together because it would destroy those components it didn't need.