intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #88
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- discipler0
Nairn, you thoroughly misunderstand DNA. Here's a primer for you:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts…
It is information, no matter how you slice it.
-----------------------------"Give Science another couple of hundred years."
Science has shown that in another couple of hundred years we have more complexity yeilded in biological systems... as we delve deeper. (side note: do you see how you express faith in what science confined to naturalistic philosophy will discover?). So complexity is only going to scream louder of design.
------------------------------
"No, there's not - I will not consider scripture 'proof' - there's been, for far too long, too much vested interest in maintaining the sanctity of your mythos."
What you errantly relegate to the dustbin of "mythos" is factual history more sound than the writings of any other historical documents and which split history and turned ordinary cowards into people willing to give their lives for what they believed. As a primer, do a study of:
Codex Siniaticus
Codex VaticanusAnd then invest some time in the science of textual criticism. Then we can have an intelligent discussion of the reliablity of the New Testament documents.
---------------------------
"Come back to me when you've developed insight into the complexity of proteins, the essential simplicity of amino acids and the propensity for many forms of simple matter to self-arrange. Then let your imagination spill into the Billions of years involved and Wonder at the possibility.. I've found this gives much credence to the potential of evolution developing what we see before us"See the link i posted here. And when you've realized that even TRILLIONs of years cannot produce irreducibly complex organisms and digitally coded information, come back and see me.