intelligent design
Out of context: Reply #84
- Started
- Last post
- 383 Responses
- Nairn0
Nairn, you're missing the key point. Science is demonstrating that there is no natural mechanism that can produce the engineered technology we see in these structures. And the information in DNA. It IS information. Mindless natural processes do not produce information.
> No, our interpretation derives meaning from data, which becomes 'information', you're showing your own ignorance there.
Let alone backup and error protection mechanisms. One would only avoid the design inference if they have an epistemological axe to grind.
> Give Science another couple of hundred years.
As for Jesus, there is compelling historical and manuscript evidence to suggest that he was exactly who he said he was...
> No, there's not - I will not consider scripture 'proof' - there's been, for far too long, too much vested interest in maintaining the sanctity of your mythos
- - -
Your sanctimony belies your own lack of research.Come back to me when you've developed insight into the complexity of proteins, the essential simplicity of amino acids and the propensity for many forms of simple matter to self-arrange. Then let your imagination spill into the Billions of years involved and Wonder at the possibility.. I've found this gives much credence to the potential of evolution developing what we see before us