Not Censored!
Out of context: Reply #23
- Started
- Last post
- 26 Responses
- ********0
"Flippidy flop goes the dutchman"
yupsters. that's me. :)
but if you read what i said carefully, you know that your statement is funny, but not very accurate to point out hypocrisy in this case.
my criticism here is:
Apple promised something huge, and presented only something so small and non-innovative.
why i like the Shuffle, and still prefer it over any other iPod:
i like to cycle and i don't need a screen, nor album covers, nor photos, nor any other optional rubbish i dont need. i just needed a simple player that integrates with my mac, that is both affordable and as simplistic as possible. that is what the shuffle is for me.
the nano on the contrary is just a regular ipod that's been crushed by an elephant.
in other words, no fucking difference.
really need sleep now,
g'nite you little rascals!
;)