discipler
discipler
Out of context: Reply #83
- Started
- Last post
- 151 Responses
- discipler0
mikotondria, you make the presupposition that the history of life began the way you just described. This is however where all the debate lies. My position (and that of many many others) is that much of what people believe about origins is not rooted in scientific evidence. There are couple of factors to consider here: 1. We are saying that the designer created man as he is today excluding some microevolutionary adaptations which resulted from environment, diet, illness and impact of a fallen world (not originally created fallen, but this bridges into theological issues). 2. So, life did not originate from a primordial soup and there is no scientific evidence to suggest that it did.