Discipler...
Out of context: Reply #182
- Started
- Last post
- 248 Responses
- discipler0
normal,
Your limited internet analogy only demonstrates that an intelligent designer was at work. It was intelligent beings who produced the slow, successive modifications. The point that has to be driven home is that slow, successive modifications + random chance cannot produce irreducibly complex systems... not even with all the time in the world. Natural selection would prevent this from happening. All the components of these biological machines must be present all at once, or the machine fails. There's no way to get around this. And the implications are clear... a cognizant designer.
As for us being "animals"... I've argued this issue here many times. Just because there is homology does not necessitate a common ancestry. It more accurately demonstrates an efficient designer who uses the same fundamental materials. Additionally, our ability to reason, have a first-person perspective, express selfless love, and other metaphysical realities, demonstrate that we are categorically superior to "animals".