London II
Out of context: Reply #29
- Started
- Last post
- 147 Responses
- iDp0
I really don't know. But it would seem that they've (al-queda) have now given Bush and Blair a leg to stand on for justifying the war in the first place don't you think?
I mean now the terrorists are claiming sides with Iraq..If we had gone into N Korea or Iran for that matter, for some reason I don't see Al-Queda suicide bombings being on the menu.
So if you are saying that any government shouldn't go to war or do anything to provoke terrorists then I find that a bit sad. That's like saying 'give little jhonny anything he wants because if we don't then he'll throw a temper tantrum'. Don't get me wrong I think war is a bad thing, I think Bushs reasons for going to war with Iraq were transperant enough (however I think the real reasons were not for oil as much as to scare the shit out countries who did support terrorism). He figured it would be a quick war and now he's got a shit load of egg on his face.
Either way I think the terrorists want some media attention and they're getting it.