Fasion Cameras
Out of context: Reply #5
- Started
- Last post
- 17 Responses
- Visia0
okay, to expand on this a bit further.
Generally fashion photographers will use either a Hasselblad:
or a 67:
http://www.pentax.ca/products/mf…
http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.as…
67's are popular because they've got pretty much the same format as the ad's that are going to be made out of the photo so the cropping remains very close to the original shot.
BUT, they're built like tanks and they're fucking heavy. Which means if your style as a photographer is to move around a lot (like mine is) then they're basically a pain in the ass.
Plus, to set yourself up with a Blad or Pentax or Mamiya digital system you're looking at about 50K. You're starting to look at Phase One digital backs:
So, you're full system, not including lighting, will run your well over 50-75K. Very much full-on pro gear.
BUT, I don't personally think that's neccassary. It would be nice but I know a lot of pros that shoot with gear waaaaay below that price range. In fact, the "pro-sumer" cameras are now offering sensors and features that rival the Blad(or Mamiya, or Pentax, or Contax)/Phase One systems.
So, if you're just starting out and you're looking to build your book then I would recommend the Canon Rebel or Nikon D-70. They're excellent cameras for the price and they'll do everything you want them to.
The only drawback on them is the the resolution will really only permit enlargement to 11*14. And that's only when you hit your exposure bang-on. If you do any extensive Pshop work then you might get into trouble with noise.
Personally, I shoot really loose and do a lot of post work. But, I've managed to shoot a lot of models portfolios (which print at a standard 9*12) and had no problems with the enlargements using the local C-Print lab.
But, I do find it tricky to print anything above an 11*14 even though I know my camera will suppport up to 16*20 if I hit the exposure bang-on.
Hope that helps.