Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #140
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- discipler0
The burden of proof, lies with both the Evolutionist AND the I.D. proponent. One must look at what science observes and form a reasonable hypothesis. I have looked at the evidence and I conclude that there is design behind the universe... not random chance with mutation.
What science observes:
1. High information content machine-like irreducibly complex structures.
2. Forms found in the fossil record that appear suddenly and without any precursors.
3. Genes and functional parts re-used in different unrelated organisms.
4. Genetic code which does not contain much discarded genetic baggage code or functionless "junk DNA".
Now, couple that with the way in which a designer would logically design:
1. Takes many parts and arrange them in highly specified and complex patterns which perform a specific function.
2. Rapidly infuses any amounts of genetic information into the biosphere, including large amounts, such that at times rapid morphological or genetic changes could occur in populations.
3. 'Re-use parts' over-and-over in different types of organisms (design upon a common blueprint).
4. Be said to typically NOT create completely functionless objects or parts (although we may sometimes think something is functionless, but not realize its true function).
Ok, NOW i must go. :)