Creationist Lies 666 apologies

Out of context: Reply #99

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 173 Responses
  • discipler0

    Big surprise, I disagree. The collection of books penned by different authors which constitutes the Bible is based on an abundance of harmonizing manuscripts which attest to it's consistansy and reliability. It has survived banning attempts, burning attempts, censorship of all forms and remains a best seller today and changes countless lives. This does not change those who would twist it "to their own destruction". I do not believe Christianity is religion, it's a relationship with a living Savior - another discussion.

    Whether you guys like it or not, the latest scientific discoveries about the complexity of the tiny machines that are the building blocks of life, demonstrate an irreducible complexity that is not consistent with what Darwinists have believed for these short 150 years or so. It's time to upgrade and look at what science is actually observing. Intelligent Design and Creationism is not about illegitimately imposing the dictates of faith upon science, but about raising rational objections to proposed Darwinian explanations of the biological world. It's about observing the latest scientific evidence, namely regarding biochemical machines.

    Finally, I challenge you to go and research the definition of the Second Law of thermodynamics and then show me how it is not saying what I (and countless other scientists) are saying.

View thread