Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #94
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- ********0
Splendid.
We seem to have got somewhere, evolution and prime cause are not mutually exclusive.
By calling that process God, however, it leads to the interpretation that the user of that word believes verbatim everything written in a collection of books, by numerous authors, through many translations and judicious edits resulting in the banning of gay marriage, and the removal of evolution from school text books.
Thats the problem I have religion, not the idea that we do not have the words to describe the initiation of the whole process, but that some people choose to throw their god-given common-sense out of the window and spout meaningless dogma, knocking on my damn front door on a Sunday morning and telling me Im going to hell forever if I dont do that same.Oh, and Discipler, no - I was reinforcing Kuz's point that it is not the responsibility of science to prove that 'mindless' natural processes cannot produce these compounds, merely that the whole concept of 'mindless v mindful' physical processes is scientifically meaningless.