Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #68
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- Kuz0
You're mixing two things together, i guess this is cos you maybe don't have the ability to understand certain things.
A car breaking down
a compounds "degrading"
Now your general thesis on the 2nd law, from what you've said, is implying they are both simply the same thing in terms of thermodynamics.
Now that is wholly false and misleading. If you throw or take away energy from a compound, a new more or less structured compound will form
If you throw energy at a car, it will explode.
All you have done, all you do, all your websites do, is try to show that these two metaphors are the same. Which is why you evoke things like "information". This is wholly dishonest. The "information" contained in the blue-prints of a car is fundamentally different to the "information" needed for atomst to bond together and form molecules.
Either you have a degree in linguistics and are deliberately trying to mislead people, or you should really understand how the words you are using are clouding your ability to think properly.