Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #40
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- mikotondria20
OK, so we've gone backwards and forwards about the 2nd law, which I will surmise as 'The tendency for...'.
And it is just that, a tendency. It doesnt not apply in every circumstance, namely the exception found in living organisms, so lets start from that point and expand from there to the point of view that the creationists take...which would probably go something like:
"Because of the observed deviance from a tendency to entropy, therefore life is a non-natural phenomenon, and therefore MUST have had supra-physical intervention to create it."
Correct ?
So, given this, describe the physical process by which this occurred..
Please do not use the word God or S/HE.
Simply demonstrating that the process is not fully understood at the moment, and that it is therefore not quantifiable will earn no marks, as will reference to passages in the bible, koran or talmut.
Please tell me exactly what your understanding is of the process and I may change my mind. If it makes sense.Go...