Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #12
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- mikotondria20
Once again creationists are pointing to some aspect of science that they have not fully understood, or about which there is something that is not fully known, such as the emergence of self-replicating, complexifying chemical species, and invoking the existence of a God..
Just because a process is not understood doesnt mean that God did it, its just not understood. It doesnt detract from the beauty and wonder that is life, the awe and intelligability of the universe and of being that part of it localised into 'human experience' is once process, only our conceptualization of it renders the illusion of a hole that some plug with the word God. The big bang is still going, as that one process, and at this very moment is reading this post. Noone will deny that the universe began, and that it has resulted in human conciousness, but to peg our limited understanding of that to a set of broader unprovable and unevidenced priniciples labelled God is just incorrect.
The tao that can be spoken of is not the tao, for god to exist there must be 'not-God', which by the very definition of the word cannot exist, therefore neither God, nor non-God exists, and the whole concept is by its own definition, a fallacy.
Think of all the things that dont exist, was it God that didnt create them, or something else ?