Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #11
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- discipler0
Kuz, the "christian sources" argument is false. Scientists in general maintain that the Second Law applies on both a Macro and Micro scale. Things degrade over time, on both levels. And there is not a shred of scientific evidence to suppor that something as complex as a single cell could have spontaneously generated. A cell is irreducibly complex meaning that if you remove even one of it's many components, it will not function - like an engineered machine. Science has never, I repeat, never observed the constituent components organize to form a functioning molecular machine like this. Not to mention the super-computer complexity of a single strand of DNA. Natural processes do not know how to exert selective pressures on something that is non functioning in the first place and then magically group all the components in the exact place and sequence they need to be for said machines to do their respective function.
Even if what you are touting were true, you merely push the issue of origins/design a step back in sequence of creation. And you never answered my question about the source of your info and whether or not it is peer reviewed and if it is published.