Creationist Lies 666 apologies
Out of context: Reply #7
- Started
- Last post
- 173 Responses
- Kuz0
ah, see, that is where you are mistaken, and your christian sources deliberately mislead you.
What you are saying, at what Creationists often deliberately mislead people into thinking, this that the second law is "the law of disorder" – which strictly prohibits the chance formation of complicated stuctures from simple parts, including complex molecules from simple ones.
This is fallacious to view the second law as a predictor of disorder. The second law concerns energy, not patterns of objects. The second law states that energy tends not to be restricted to one or a few energy levels in atoms and molecules, but to be dispersed to as many such levels as possible – rephrased in homely terms involving molecules, "Intense or concentrated energy tends to spread out and diffuse".
In that spreading-out process, macro objects sometimes are displaced and moved to random arrangements that humans subjectively define as "disorder". A violent wind not only can break a window in a building and blow the papers in an office all over a square mile, but also destroy the building itself. However, this is an incidental consequence of dispersing and spreading out of the energy in a tornado, not an event that is due to the innate nature or behavior of inanimate objects themselves in the absence of such an energy flow. Moving common objects around so they fall in disorder is a singular and accidental aspect of the universal tendency of energy to diffuse, not the general thrust or meaning or requirement of the second law that applies to objects.