Creationist Lies

Out of context: Reply #353

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 827 Responses
  • ********
    0

    Discipler you wouldn't understand science if it fell off of a building and hit you on the head.

    Thw whole point of science is to investigate nature. Science works on theories. The enqirires are never proven, they are and can only be proven wrong. A scientist would be willing to overturn long held ideas if their was enough evidence that it did not accurately model the observable world.

    An ID could never by definition except the idea that God could be disproven as a source for everything, or accept the fact that the bible would be disproved by evidence. To do so would underlie the argument for it.

    ID is belief in a preset set of conditions - hence faith - and not science.

    The fact that you can quote scientific jargon nonstop doesn't mean you understand the very fundamental idea that underlies it.

View thread