Fuk u shima
- Started
- Last post
- 44 Responses
- GeorgesIV0
thank god, noone lives there
- ohhhhhsnap0
Are there any sites or resources that explain "what to do?" not that there's 1 answer.
but as far as water intake (where to get water, etc) how to prepare for illness' ... just curious.
- We're fucked. Deal with it.
dasohr - there are numerous natural things you can take to help counteract radiation. ie: http://one-vibration…sea_sea
- We're fucked. Deal with it.
- Akagiyama0
Why is northern Ohio so jacked up?
- sea_sea0
^^ohhsnap yes there are supplements you can take to help your system cope with radiation. for example, iodine, green algae and ginseng to name a few.
two links i found:
"11 Vitamins, Herbs & Foods that Detox Radiation Exposure"
http://www.organicauthority.com/…"Diet and Natural Remedies to counteract Radiation"
http://one-vibration.com/group/b…- sea_sea this is awesome, the detox radiation exposure link... good to know.ohhhhhsnap
- animatedgif0
- interestingly, not a single "red" area like you see in CAmonospaced
- ZOOP0
With things like this it never hurts to heir on the side of caution; as unbelievable as it might seem sometimes populations are lied to. The effects not being immediate, plausible deniability can save billions from lawsuits in coming years.
- ZOOP0
- Sep0
- ohhhhhsnap0
I think that any article that says "Absolutely Fried"... I kind of want to discount, almost immediately because of it's fear mongering. Just had a chat with an environmentalist/scientist on the west coast who gave me a little bit of the 411.
Though I feel if "we're screwed we're screwed," nothing you can do but live your life and maybe take precautions. Lobbying for (http://terrapower.com) clean reactors might be really really difficult in the world we live in.
- imagineallthepeople0
.
"Water exposed to radiation from the Fukushima plant would reach the U.S. at levels at least 100 times lower than the U.S.’s drinking water threshold, Nuclear Regulatory Commission chairman Allison Macfarlane said at a Dec. 6 briefing in Tokyo.The assurances haven’t eased concerns for some. “I’m terrified,” Doreen Jean Dempski, a children’s book author, said by phone from her home more than 5,000 miles across the Pacific from Fukushima in Carpinteria, California. “My boyfriend is a surfer and he spends hours a day in the water.”
- ukit20
There seems to be a lot of fear mongering going around on internets...a year after the disaster, has anyone in the U.S. been found with radiation related disease?
- do radiation related diseases expose themselves that quickly even?monospaced
- It could be a subtle thing where the effects aren't noticed until a significant set has cancer or something 10 years latermonospaced
- OK, but is it feasible that radiation makes its way across the Pacific Ocean and remains a health threat?ukit2
- on that I have no ideamonospaced
- arne0
- benfal990
people told me in another thread that science will fix everything, that everything is fine and that humanz is doing everything perfectly ok. There's no problem anywhere. all. is. fine.
- since science is the process of figuring things out, then you're right. Beats the hell out of prayingmonospaced
- imagineallthepeople0
"OK, but is it feasible that radiation makes its way across the Pacific Ocean and remains a health threat?"
not only feasable, but guaranteed to make its way across the pacific... "health threat" depends on how you define it. in this case the kinds of materials and the amount of material that have been leaking and are leaking to make their way to the US are *way* below the level of what the majority of experts consider worriesome or even dangerous. US exposure to fukushima is in the thousandths of local everyday radiation exposure from planeride, MRI, xray, wireless communication, natural sources, etc. which very few people worry or panic about.
- imagineallthepeople0
to hit the US in a meaningful sense you'd need a massive spill of the hardcore stuff, plutonium for example, which didnt happen in fukushima.
- No worries the tuna, salmon, lobster, etc... are already laced with radiation that we everyday.utopian
- imagineallthepeople0
.
to put things like fukushima and tchernobyl in perspective they could compare those accidental spills to the radioactive pollution caused by atmospheric testing in the 50s and 60s, the levels back then were many times higher, and globally at that.- yeah, and we all turned out fine ;)monospaced
- ...or so you think :)ukit2
- and people local to testing had v.high rates of cancer etc. Your point is?fadein11
- ukit20
Recently I read that during the Cold War, the U.S. actually kept planes armed with nuclear weapons in the air, flying around the country at all times in case they needed to respond to some kind of attack. If there was just a single accident during that time the world would have turned out a pretty different place.
- why? nuclear weapons have to be detonated to work. It wouldn't have been pleasant local to crash though.fadein11