Google Web Designer
- Started
- Last post
- 31 Responses
- Julesvm0
looks better (but still hasn't shipped...) http://macaw.co
- no animationfyoucher1
- interesting!prophetone
- This actually looks very good.
subscribedESKEMA
- zaq0
the code is not that clean
http://clouditoria.com/qbn/index…
check the source
- feel0
there is another tool like this called adobe edge, and its the same premisse, a visual code animator. but what i've heard from the codes I know is that it generates an ugly code that you can't implement in your existing code, as well as a library of comands and such.
Apparently this google software works better on that side, giving you a better code, we don't know yet what libraries it use. I'll keep you guys posted on our findings.
- please do, i have my doubts about the code cleanlinessprophetone
- sureshot0
web design was dead 6 years ago. I'm going to be a barber. I'm not kidding.
- anyone need a cut?sureshot
- what haircut framework are you using?spot13
- don't forget your crop tool!
oh man!aliastime - lol lol lolsureshot
- will the haircut be responsive depending on the conditions?slinky
- I'm almost bold. Can you use content aware?goldieboy
- I also do brazilian wax on dudes.sureshot
- "sureshot manscaping services"meffid
- Continuity0
Internet company/browser developer develops web content authoring tool.
Hello, Netscape Composer.
- detritus0
I'd prefer to see Google invest in the sort of browser/editor the WWW was originally supposed to run on, where (within reason and bounds, of course) every consumer can also be an editor and a content creator.
As you say, ESKEMA, it's crazy that 20-odd years down the line, there's more of a divide between creation and consumption than there ever was.
I was hoping something like this was what the above link would be, but I'll take a nifty HTML5 animation tool anyway...
- No there isn't - there are 100s of tools for non-techs to build sites.fadein11
- tumblr, wordpress, squarespace... hundreds of them.fadein11
- i see third party sites and services in your list - that is not the way the fundamentals of the WWW were sposed to bedetritus
- it's a philosophical point, granted - but there's no easy ownership of the services you've suggested.detritus
- (well, wp can be self-hosted, but it's an uber fucker from a non-techie's perspective)detritus
- Those examples are extremely templated and not easily cusomized.CyBrainX
- What do you expect? its a technical game - even desktop publishing requires a pro to do well.fadein11
- Content, not design.
Content.
½ the world couldn't give a fuck about design.detritus
- ESKEMA0
this seems very ad oriented at the moment. Would love to see something that would also focus on layouts, not just animations.
but great to see stuff like this finally appearing. It amazes me how in a time of internet like this, the tools to create web content are still stupid and non existent.- indeed. think this is more tailored for features to drop into a site rather than the whole site build.fadein11
- zaq0
Flash is dead. Long live Flash
- spot130
Awesome! I knew they had a secret GUI trick up their sleeve for making animated / interactive Google Doodles!