Ron Paul Channel
- Started
- Last post
- 23 Responses
- youngdesigner
The Ron Paul Channel will begin by providing fresh, engaging original programming each week, available to subscribers live or on-demand. Subscriptions will cost $9.95 per month and provide subscribers with direct access to Dr. Paul and a diverse array of guests.
“Americans are tired of the games and the lies of today’s media. They want the truth. I have been astonished by the flood of interest in the channel from tens of thousands of people in just a matter of hours,” said Paul. “Imagine this: no censors, no barricades, no statists. We will be able to engage viewers directly on subjects that matter most to them; from finances to civil liberties to foreign policy.”
The Ron Paul Channel expands upon Paul’s vast grassroots and online support, capitalizing on the increasing demand for accessible, interesting and original programming. The Ron Paul Channel will stream online, allowing subscribers to watch it when they want, where they want and on the device they want: internet-connected televisions, computers, tablets, and smart phones.
- prophetone0
Dr. Paul and his high-school love and wife of more than 55 years, Carol, have five children, 19 grandchildren, 2 Falkors and six great-grandchildren.
- colin_s0
ron paul and the publications he created were also incredibly racist.
libertarianism is fine and all if you have no global landscape but in this day and age a primary ideology would do nothing but create massive amount of bloodshed.
not trying to defend the corrupt chicago policies of obama or the absolute bullshit that is the house GOP but god. can someone please represent a moderate, social based ideology that doesn't just triumph the atrocities of white men from 50 years ago.
- this is bs, have you ever even google it or looked it up, it's a typical smear campaignGeorgesIV
- peopel who dont go for libertarianism usually dont because they dont to take responsibility for there own livesdeathboy
- db - seriously? Maybe you better go read up on it a little moreformed
- You will always find them saying someone should do something about thatdeathboy
- forgot the quote. but it bascially said there are those people who want liberty, and those who want to be free of libertydeathboy
- liberty. A lot of people want to be free but without the responsibility and prefer rules and laws cause they think they will be favoreddeathboy
- will be favoreddeathboy
- Ah, right, let's give you a six shooter and some silver and call it a day. Yeah. that works. Fucking insanity.formed
- your eloquence ad moniker speak much to the merits of your compelling argument, deathboy.detritus
- teh0
Weather it's Ron Paul, Ralph Nader or Mike Gravel politicians are all cunts.
- "Whether" for fucks sake.MarleyMarl
- < Thanks Type Tommy.CygnusZero4
- nb0
What's a "channel"?
- Llyod0
this guy is such a clown
- randommail0
He should have set up a YouTube channel with that has both free and subscription-based content.
oh well.
- lol. Nah, that would be, like, socialism or somethingformed
- waterhouse0
^
Against reproductive freedom.
Against marriage equality.
- youngdesigner0
^
Thats a lie, Dr. Paul believes in those things, he just doesn't want the government to get involved. He wants to give you the freedom of choice, so Texas can have a different law from San Franicsco.
Stop spreading lies
- He's personally against these things, shill.waterhouse
- difference is hes personally against them, but he wants the decision to be state level not federal level.deathboy
- and the views on the marriage are a bit more in depth than against gay marriagedeathboy
- waterhouse0
State laws, federal laws... So many of Ron Paul's arguments boil down to pseudo intellectualism. He's an ayatollah of the fundamentalist original framer's caucus. These are great classroom debates, but there's a reason Ron Paul will die as he lived: a fringe Republican.
My biggest gripe is that his choir boys are immensely fucking preachy.
- state vs federal is a huge part of balance of power and keeping a healthy democratic process. Ideas need competition toodeathboy
- competition toodeathboy
- adn i have no idea what you mean aytollah of the fundamentalist original framers caucus. Id love to hear that explanationdeathboy
- explanation.deathboy
- oh wait i get it. u mean he stands by the rationale of the framers. Guess its only negative if u have specific points of what the framers faulted ondeathboy
- the framers faulted on. Slavery for one. But i get that pressure. Took awhile but worked out except for reverse discrimination afterwards.deathboy
- GeorgesIV0
I'll post this and be done, pretty much summarize the whole bs during the past election, this is what a smear campaign looks like
- Now this is out in tinfoil territory.waterhouse
- I guess you must not have been paying attention lately,GeorgesIV
- A shame people dont take their local elections this serious.teh
- They do it all the time to progressives, Nader, Paul, Gravel, Shame the majority of voters still watch tv.teh