Esquire redesign
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- colin_s0
i think this is pretty awful. no hierarchy of content just ... squares.
- boobs0
A lot of the photos are dreadful.
- wordssssss0
I am on the "don't like" side of the fence. It feels like a portfolio theme as someone said.
- hans_glib0
it's poor the way you have to click twice to get to the meat of an article. unnecessary "header" page just get straight to it. Also you have to click all different parts of the screen to move through the site :/
- so weird, I only have to click on it once to get to the articlemonospaced
- Yep me too, 1 click. Perhaps his mouse is brokenqTime
- utopian0
This is how it supposed to be done!
http://mashable.com
- utopian0
I'll give Esquire 6 months before they redesign it again.
- fyoucher10
This is a disaster. The entire thing is a big distraction. Don't like how the page refreshes and reorders things when I click a link either. It was hard enough to find what I wanted to read in the 1st place. I'd think it'd be possible to swap content w/o a page refresh.
Think it's trying too hard to be a print mag as a website and it completely fails. It looks pretty though.
I'll give Esquire 1 month before they redesign it again.
- so Iggy says 3 months, utopian says 6, and you say 1... you guys should start a betmonospaced
- wordssssss0
@monospaced why are you so defensive? Are people not allowed to share their opinions if it differs from yours?
- if you read my comments, you know I'm not attacking anyone's opinion... in fact, I'm doing the opposite, but hate awaymonospaced
- How is what I said "hate"?wordssssss
- saying I only have to click once is not a difference of opinion, or defensiveness, it's a simple factmonospaced
- "hate" as in your'e "hating" on me for what you THINK is me being defensive or not allowing for differences of opinionmonospaced
- which, of course, is not the casemonospaced
- Lord Baby Jesus.wordssssss
- Anyway... I didn't attack any opinionsmonospaced
- dammit mono, how do you manage to ALWAYS get into these kind of discussions?pressplay
- I think because people are always trying to find a way to rip on me, even if unjustifiablymonospaced
- Fatal0
I think the header is terrible, the way they display the content wrong for a magazine (maybe its good for displaying watches) and I hope this responsive sites start to detect you're using a pc browser to avoid the 6 different versions jumping jack flashing each time I graze the window.