Public Voice Network
- GIF vs JIF 4343
- good music with fake inst… 33
- religion 215215
- London machete attack 3030
- Magic Hat vs. West Sixth 77
- the gif animation thread 1846218462
- What are you listening to… 55855585
- LA Life 1414
- Pic of the Day 7473674736
- Experiential Design 1717
- You're at a party and… 6767
- blog 5770657706
- Vid of the Day 1505515055
- Daft Cars / Anyone? 66
- Show some recent work 55565556
- Star Trek Into Darkness 6666
- Your Bike 268268
- Trailer Of The Day 797797
- I ❤ Wood 332332
- Made a memorial page for … 2323
- Xbox: New Generation Reve… 7272
- Art of the Day Thread 322322
- draw something 440440
- Video Games... 923923
macbook pro 2.3 vs 2.6ghz 1717 Responses
Last post: 3 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Jan 30, 13, 10:37 a.m.
- Aa77
I am about to pick up a new macbook pro w/ retina for video editing and motion graphics work.
I am definitely going to upgrade to 16gb of ram, but I am wondering if there would be much noticeable difference between the 2.3 ghz processor and the 2.6ghz. Both options are quad-core
is it worth an extra $600 for the 2.6? I'm not trying to be cheap, but if its only a matter of a render taking slightly less time, I might go with the 2.3 option.
anyone using either option for video?
any thoughts?thanks in advance
- Jan 30, 13, 10:37 a.m. – Permalink
- bored2death
Do you know what .3ghz feels like?
It's like night and day.


- Dog-earJan 30, 13, 10:40 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
For a $100 upgrade it's not that much, and more processor is always better.


- Dog-earJan 30, 13, 10:48 a.m. – Permalink
- Hombre_Lobo
If your getting the ram upgrade because it's soldered on, that makes sense.
But bare in mind the extra ram will in no way improve render times. In some tests more ram actually increases it (but only by 1% or something negligible)
I can't see how you would need more than 8gb unless you would have every program on you computer open at once. Which actually still isn't that bad with Linux based machines like a mac.
But i suppose you cant upgrade later and Might make it easier to sell on too.

- Dog-earFeb 2, 13, 6:32 p.m. – Permalink
- animatedgif
"macbook pro w/ retina for video editing and motion graphics work"
Why?... It'll look completely different on the screens it'll actually be played on.


- Dog-earFeb 4, 13, 3:05 a.m. – Permalink
- OP31
I just bought the non retina with 2.6 processor. Replaced the hard drive with a 256GB SSD to install all my applications and then removed the optical drive and installed a 512GB SSD. I wanted a retina, but since you can't update them down the road, I went with the Highres Screen Non Retina instead. Its really fast and have no problems running after effects and photoshop.


- Dog-earFeb 4, 13, 8:06 a.m. – Permalink





