Star Wars Episode VII 6565 Responses

Last post: 1 month ago | Thread started: Jan 24, 13, 1:58 p.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• CygnusZero4

  So it's....

  http://www.imdb.com/news/ni45651…

  Jan 24, 13, 1:58 p.m. – Permalink

• monospaced

  needs more lens flare

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:02 p.m. – Permalink

• utopian

  I smell a Cloverfield cameo?

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:03 p.m. – Permalink

• Ramanisky2

  wait wut....
  director Ben Affleck was also in contention,

  REALLY?

  • Good Will Kenobi– fadein111/5

    i was just about to mention that. i was like 'wait, wut... Ben Affleck... Really?'– lodef2/5

    Gone Baby Gone is great, The Town is decent.– nb3/5

    Argo– Bullitt4/5

    J-Lo...– see_thru5/5

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:04 p.m. – Permalink

• Ramanisky2

  • yeees!– teh1/2

    its not like that...– qTime2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:14 p.m. – Permalink

• CygnusZero4

  The lens flares coming off the lightsabres should be glorious!

  • lol– monospaced1/2

    ahahaha'– Akagiyama2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:16 p.m. – Permalink

• colin_s

  this kind of sucks because of how awesome star trek was and how good the new one looks. there are any number of talents (joss whedon?) who could helm star wars.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:19 p.m. – Permalink

• mantrakid

  • lol– omg1/3

    great– teh2/3

    really great– twokids3/3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:32 p.m. – Permalink

• fadein11

  Only on QBN... people moaning about the best SW news in 25 years.

  • we're just having fun– monospaced

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:50 p.m. – Permalink

• tank02

  

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 2:58 p.m. – Permalink

• i_monk

  Star Wars is shit.

  • Star Gate is better...– oey

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3 p.m. – Permalink

• Continuity

  'Previously, on Star Wars ... '

  • I got that reference.– DRIFTMONKEY1/2

    HAHAHA, I hear Jack's voice and everything.– monospaced2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3 p.m. – Permalink

• pr2

  I'm too old for this shit.
  I stopped watching SW after that shitty one remake came out.
  Then stopped re-watching the classics cause i realized this crap is for kids.

  • This.– i_monk1/4

    http://www.youtube.c…– severian2/4

    s, nothing that i get paid to shoot i ever watch - it's that trivial and dumb.– pr23/4

    This– twokids4/4

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3:04 p.m. – Permalink

• fadein11

  star wars is for BIG kids

  • how was already big as kid. i'm still big, but no kid anymore.– oey

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3:11 p.m. – Permalink

• sureshot

  As a kid I always thought Darth Vader was Cleo McDowell wearing a weird suit.

  • haha, that has multiple levels of incorrectness.– bulletfactory1/2

    Alas, it was King Jaffe Joffur all along, in cahoots with the Green Cross Code man.– 5timuli2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3:16 p.m. – Permalink

• autoflavour

  there is only fail.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3:17 p.m. – Permalink

• CyBrainX

  What happened to Abrams wanting to concentrate on Star Trek??

  • hes dyslexic– moldero

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 3:28 p.m. – Permalink

• inteliboy

  Fuck. Abrams? Ugh...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 4:21 p.m. – Permalink

• CygnusZero4

  Abrams just made a 2nd Star Trek. Thats enough. He grew up a huge SW fan so Im pretty sure he's going to try to do this right. And Lucas will be involved in some way, maybe as a consultant for the story.

  There's so much for them to pull from after Ep.6, so I think this is good news. Abrams obviously knows how to make movies and he's a creative guy. I thought that new Star Trek was excellent.

  I think its great news. The fact that Lucas doesnt get to control everything is the best thing thats happened to SW in a long time. Im excited about a great new SW trilogy.

  • <– fadein111/3

    +1– discoduro2/3

    +2– AK_tiv473/3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 5:07 p.m. – Permalink

• CygnusZero4

  Something I wondered about those lens flares. Abrams and I think the DP said in the Star Trek bonus features that they were natural and were not added into the movie. They looked very natural so they didnt bug me too much, but if this is true, why dont more movies have them that much? Did they use some different cameras on Star Trek?

  • J.J. also admitted, after the fact, it was way overdone... (whether they were real or added.)– ETM1/7

    yeah starTrek was subtle, but i still dont like being reminded im looking through a lens when im trying to get into a story– moldero2/7

    few movies have them to that extend because on Star Trek lights were pointed directly towards the camera in order
    to intentionally achieve that effect.– spl33nidoru3/7

    to intentionally achieve that effect.– spl33nidoru4/7

    (very often, lights outside of the frame and not necessary to the scene or character lighting)– spl33nidoru5/7

    Ah ok, gotcha. I do recall a lot of lights in that movie pointing right at the camera.– CygnusZero46/7

    Many were clearly fake as the exact same flare could be seen in CG shots as well as live ones.– ETM7/7

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 5:10 p.m. – Permalink

• identity

  Would have preferred Joss Whedon - but JJ is alright by me.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 24, 13, 8:08 p.m. – Permalink