Amazon Pulls Book

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 62 Responses
  • moIdero0

    • Is Anderson Cooper an opinion journalist now?ukit
    • I agree the book is disgusting but it would be nice to have some normal news againukit
  • ok_not_ok0

    Hey now!

  • drgz0

    By onegoldpanner - See all my reviews
    This review is from: The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure (Kindle Edition)
    This is my SECOND review for this book... my first one was deleted by Amazon. I have contacted NUMEROUS news agencies, as well as the FBI. I have contacted Oprah, John Walsh and Diane sawyer. I will be on this until it is taken down. And As a customer of Amazon I will no longer be one, as soon as this is taken down I will delete my account. And I am going to make sure NONE of my family and friends will buy from you either! SHAME ON YOU for listing SUCH FILTH!!

    Of course the book was pulled, If it weren't pulled -- american mouth-foaming pedophile hunters with sticks and spears would gather in echelons and lynch the directors of Amazon.

    This is not a joke, 10 years ago in Plymouth they had anti-pedophile riots after the The Sun and Daily Mail published a list of Plymouth pedophiles (fictive addresses of course, that is, as it turned out these addresses did not exist). Outraged residents burned down the entire block, then went to march on the next block, not finding any pedophiles they burned a pediatrician office.

    http://www.martijn.org/info/gsbs… <-. Scientific article about the nature of anti-pedophile hysteria. The conclusions are in principle well-known: that in 66% of the cases where boys, who are victims of pedophilia, had sex with an older women, are left only with warm memories. The authorities believe that these victims are deadly traumatized, and sentence the women to longer prison terms than for murder.

    "Child "sexual assault" charges involving "victims" between 13 and 15 frequently involve consensual sex with other teenagers rather than adults--sometimes same-aged teens are arrested for "sexual assault" of each other. Boys as young as 10 have been compelled to put on penile plethysmographs and have been subjected to ammonia aversion therapy, a treatment long ago abandoned as unethical and dangerous in the case of homosexuals. Other
    "therapies" that young teens are currently being subjected to include being forced to recite daily: "I am a pedophile and am not fit to live in human society...I can never be trusted...everything I say is a lie...I can never be cured." Moreover, some of the leading sex offender therapists recommend that parents should pry into the sexual fantasies of their 11-year-old sons, and, if these are "deviant," should have their sons subjected to lie detectors, penile plethysmographs, and aversion therapy. "

    I'm retelling for those who do not understand: To a boy's (10-11 yo) penis a special device is tied whcih measures erection. The boy is then shown child pornography. If erection rises the boy is given concentrated ammonia to smell. The child is declared "cured" after losing the erection.

    Also, parents are advised to turn in their children who have sexual fantasies, for treatment, before the children commit pedophilia with other teens of the same age. By the way, the child who has been "caught", in addition to the treatment will have his name in the register of "sex offenders" with a ban to live anywhere except under the bridge.
    And because the register is available on the Internet with addresses, sex offenders are constantly beaten or killed by anxious fighters of pedophilia.

    The girls are much worse off. For the lack of a penis they end up sniffing ammonia to child porn several hours a week, without any prospect of losing an erection. All this by court's decision.
    In a typical situation, a similar "treatment" ends with suicide or in a nut house.

    There is a very plausible theory that the cause of American prosperity in the 80-90s was tied to a boom of sexual harassment. As a result, people began to sublimate in business. Given the state of the U.S. economy now, there is an understandable desire of a new wave of antisexual neuroticism.

  • Jimbo820

    What's the main cause of pedophilia?

  • jetSkii0

    Step 1: complete! Media mob wins

    Step 2: Now get all the names of the people who has downloaded the book from Amazon and prosecute them.

  • jetSkii0

    I think the biggest factor here is that nobody has ever read the book. We're all basing our thoughts on what we've heard in the media. Yet everyone is ready to pass judgement and quick to stomp out words on paper. The rest is history, because no one will listen any further.

    No one will stick their heads out for a pedophile, otherwise, they might be labelled as a pedophile themselves, so Amazon is left standing alone against censorship. Everyone else is willing to sweep the idea under the rug and turn the other cheek. Having not read the book, people feel a good decision was made. I highly doubt the angry mob has even read the book. I highly doubt anyone who has posted on this topic on the hundreds of websites out there, has read the book. How could they? It's been censored by folks who also haven't read the book, so now were all just as stupid with them.

    • thisdoublespaced
    • as uncomfortable as I am with censorship your words are nonsense.monkeyshine
    • that's because you're letting your emotions take controljetSkii
  • monkeyshine0

    Oh my, now PETA is jumping on the band wagon. Here we go...

    http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/1…

  • monkeyshine0

    This is going to be a hot issue as self publishing becomes more accessible.

  • jetSkii0

  • ukit0

    My guess would be that the book is pretty bad.

    But at the end of the day its just a book. If the paedos can't buy it off Amazon they will just buy it mail order from an adult bookstore somewhere, or even download it online as PDF.

    If the idea was that we shouldn't encourage them by listing it, well, the media attention around this has now created far more awareness of this book than would have existed otherwise.

    At some point you gotta ask yourself whether it's worth the effort of trying to figure out what people should or shouldn't be able to read. How about spending the effort, like Moldero said, getting brutal in cracking down on actual pedophiles? Rather than arguing over whether a book can be for sale on Amazon.

  • babaganush0

    I agree with unit to some respect. Comparing it with catcher in the rye is ridiculous. We debate daily about the nature of media here - it has never been easier to self- publish etc.

    No one has burned this book - if we want to read it we will still be able to access it. So really it hasn't been censored and it is up to Amazon as a brand to decide as they see fit...society obviously has an intolerance to child abuse - this can be crass and knee jerk but also there is a very real disgust with how it subjugates and ruins the future lives of human beings.

  • ukit0

    Comparing to Catcher in the Rye isn't a good comparison in terms of the content, but it does bring up the question, where do you draw the line? After all Catcher was dropped by many high schools due to the exact same issue, people being outraged by it.

    The question is how do we decide what is banned and what isn't? You could take the "mob rule" approach (whatever the majority doesn't like) or the "First Amendment" approach (protect everything within reason, even if the majority finds it offensive). Amazon was trying to go to the "First Amendment" approach, which I think they deserve some credit for, until popular outrage forced them to backtrack.

  • SteveJobs0

    it's not black and white, but most of society has always and will always feel the same about this sort of thing. just as it will about any topic who's theme compromises the santity of life; particularly that of an innocent child. these values transcend any cultural or religious beliefs, and as such should be upheld as a vote of the majority.

    • you, my friend, are talking from a very limited understanding of societies.pr2
  • moIdero0

    it would be cool if someone racked the 3000 + sales and kept a watch on these sick fucks, and maybe handed that list to a different kid of psycho predator if you know what i mean.

  • moIdero0

    immediate castration should be mandatory for all of these sick fuckers besides the prison time they get, and in some cases these people should be tortured, fuck pulling them out of general population in the pen, let them get ass fucked, see how they like it.

  • moIdero0

    • my anger above made me think of this. lolmoIdero
  • scarabin0

    it's up to amazon to decide what it wants to sell. i don't consider it a threat to my rights because the move wasn't government-sanctioned.

  • scarabin0

    amazon has pulled other titles in the past as well, including "Understanding Loved Boys and Boylovers" and video game "RapeLay"

  • georgesIII0

    WWJD?

  • jetSkii0

    Steve Jobs,

    I think we've just witnessed the first digital book burning of our century. At least first on the Kindle and not the iPad:). Since everyone was quick to judge the book by its cover, we will never know the contents of that book. That book could have actually prevented the next kid from getting harmed and molested. Letting us peer into the mind of these individuals makes us smarter, not stupid. If we left things up to the majority, you and I know that doesn't mean it's right.