Amazon Pulls Book
- Started
- Last post
- 62 Responses
- whereRI0
YOU CAN JUST KILL THEM
- drgz0
By onegoldpanner - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Pedophile's Guide to Love and Pleasure (Kindle Edition)
This is my SECOND review for this book... my first one was deleted by Amazon. I have contacted NUMEROUS news agencies, as well as the FBI. I have contacted Oprah, John Walsh and Diane sawyer. I will be on this until it is taken down. And As a customer of Amazon I will no longer be one, as soon as this is taken down I will delete my account. And I am going to make sure NONE of my family and friends will buy from you either! SHAME ON YOU for listing SUCH FILTH!!Of course the book was pulled, If it weren't pulled -- american mouth-foaming pedophile hunters with sticks and spears would gather in echelons and lynch the directors of Amazon.
This is not a joke, 10 years ago in Plymouth they had anti-pedophile riots after the The Sun and Daily Mail published a list of Plymouth pedophiles (fictive addresses of course, that is, as it turned out these addresses did not exist). Outraged residents burned down the entire block, then went to march on the next block, not finding any pedophiles they burned a pediatrician office.
http://www.martijn.org/info/gsbs… <-. Scientific article about the nature of anti-pedophile hysteria. The conclusions are in principle well-known: that in 66% of the cases where boys, who are victims of pedophilia, had sex with an older women, are left only with warm memories. The authorities believe that these victims are deadly traumatized, and sentence the women to longer prison terms than for murder.
"Child "sexual assault" charges involving "victims" between 13 and 15 frequently involve consensual sex with other teenagers rather than adults--sometimes same-aged teens are arrested for "sexual assault" of each other. Boys as young as 10 have been compelled to put on penile plethysmographs and have been subjected to ammonia aversion therapy, a treatment long ago abandoned as unethical and dangerous in the case of homosexuals. Other
"therapies" that young teens are currently being subjected to include being forced to recite daily: "I am a pedophile and am not fit to live in human society...I can never be trusted...everything I say is a lie...I can never be cured." Moreover, some of the leading sex offender therapists recommend that parents should pry into the sexual fantasies of their 11-year-old sons, and, if these are "deviant," should have their sons subjected to lie detectors, penile plethysmographs, and aversion therapy. "I'm retelling for those who do not understand: To a boy's (10-11 yo) penis a special device is tied whcih measures erection. The boy is then shown child pornography. If erection rises the boy is given concentrated ammonia to smell. The child is declared "cured" after losing the erection.
Also, parents are advised to turn in their children who have sexual fantasies, for treatment, before the children commit pedophilia with other teens of the same age. By the way, the child who has been "caught", in addition to the treatment will have his name in the register of "sex offenders" with a ban to live anywhere except under the bridge.
And because the register is available on the Internet with addresses, sex offenders are constantly beaten or killed by anxious fighters of pedophilia.The girls are much worse off. For the lack of a penis they end up sniffing ammonia to child porn several hours a week, without any prospect of losing an erection. All this by court's decision.
In a typical situation, a similar "treatment" ends with suicide or in a nut house.There is a very plausible theory that the cause of American prosperity in the 80-90s was tied to a boom of sexual harassment. As a result, people began to sublimate in business. Given the state of the U.S. economy now, there is an understandable desire of a new wave of antisexual neuroticism.
- Jimbo820
What's the main cause of pedophilia?
- jetSkii0
Step 1: complete! Media mob wins
Step 2: Now get all the names of the people who has downloaded the book from Amazon and prosecute them.
- Dodecahedron0
how did it get on there to begin with? You can't put hate propaganda or 'how to' books on torture on amazon can you?
- jetSkii0
Christopher Finan, the president of the American Booksellers Association for Free Expression, argued that the book should not have been banned on the grounds that it was neither child pornography nor legally obscene, due to the fact that it does not have pictures.
- Dodecahedron0
I guess its true you can't judge a book by its cover. ..or wait maybe you can and this proves it.
- jetSkii0
Having reached the top 100 list on Amazon's website. Those who have downloaded the e-book may face legalities due to Section 160 of The Criminal Justice Act of 1988. This is a Serious Arrestable Offence carrying a maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment.
- Dodecahedron0
why? it was not a banned illegal book? Amazon should be the one being charged.
- babaganush0
I have just had a son (6 days old). Of course paedophillia abhors me and I guess I'm quite a 'bloke' in that it's fists 'n fury first with stuff like this. I was going to say that this book acknowledges the fact that no matter how much we hate it, these people will still offend (even if within their own heads, with their own eyes) and that if one person is dissuaded from living out their fantasy by other means (a book), then as a parent, I feel relieved.
But of course the other argument is that sad as it may be (and not necessarily from the offender's free will), you're a fuck up and need removed from the gene pool for the greater good as is the law of the jungle.
I think the balance lies between the two. Read a book if you must, progress to the alternative with my child and I will do all I can to remove you from the gene pool anyway
- congrats on your son :)moIdero
- Im a father as well, 2 year old daughter.moIdero
- Thanks Moldero, much appreciated :)babaganush
- babaganush0
Btw I love the fact that the author's name embodies everything that a paediphile is god for in my book
- Phil Gaves
- ukit0
I don't think there's any argument that pedophilia is bad, shocking and everything else. But I agree more with what jetskii is saying. If you are going to start banning stuff IMO you can't just do it completely arbitrarily, you need rules about what gets banned and what doesn't.
Otherwise it's like mob rule - the only time something will be banned is when people kick up a shit storm about it, as in this case. Is that really the way it should work?
Now obviously every company has a different approach to stuff like this and a place like Wal-Mart or Barnes and Noble would never in a million years consider carrying this title. The difference with web companies is that they tend to come from a more liberal mindset, and to their credit it seems like Amazon tried to stay true to the principle of total press freedom, until the media pressure on them just became too costly.
- scarabin0
you guys are acting like it's your right for amazon to carry everything and that they should consult you before taking something off their shelves.
they're a private company and don't have to answer to anyone when it comes to what they want to sell or don't sell.
they didn't remove it because it was distasteful, they removed it because consumers were making a scene and they had to protect their brand image.
- ukit0
You're right they don't, but one of the interesting aspects in this is that Amazon carried the book to begin with and resisted efforts to delist it. Now to be fair, I don't think Amazon supports pedophiles, I just think they are more strongly committed philosophically to actually being a neutral platform for people to sell books. Which as a general principle is a good thing.
- that or they know removing products = less income so generally avoid the practicescarabin
- You could say the same about any company, but most of them are not so liberal. I really do think it has to do with the tech community mindset, you see a similar thing with a lot of what Google does.ukit
- community mindset, you see a similar thing with a lot of what Google does.ukit
- yeahscarabin
- lowimpakt0
@ukit " if you are going to start banning stuff IMO you can't just do it completely arbitrarily, you need rules about what gets banned and what doesn't."
yes and no. From my perspective, you can't predict the future and trends/perceptions will change so each decision should be taken in context of the time and attitudes.
I agree with the decision because it's not even pretending to be art..
- Trends/perceptions don't change that quick. It's not like this book will be acceptable to most people 10 years from now or something:)ukit
- rules are good but common sense should always come before whats written in black and whitemoIdero
- But there's not really much common sense involved, just one book that got focused on.ukit
- I'm sure if you delve through Amazon's catalog, you'd find hundreds that are just as offensive and outrageousukit
- ukit0
I guess what I mean is that when Amazon decides these things they need some sort of rule to go by. For instance, no to anything related to pedophilia, but yes to books that teach you how to build bombs (like some that are still on sale there).
Or maybe they say no to all of that. But leaving it completely to the discretion of the lower level people is a recipe for chaos and arbitrary decisions.
- moIdero0
lol @ facebook group image
