Public Voice Network
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2626
- Beeeees! 1313
- Aging = Scary 1414
- Prometheus 145145
- Pic of the Day 6331563315
- The Pitch 114114
- Outfit of the Day 55
- the gif animation thread 1283912839
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
rebranding Playboy 5656 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 22, 10, 7:43 a.m.
Out of context: Response #10 [Mar 22, 10, 7:43 a.m.]
- Khurram
Eugh, he was getting AWAY from the overtly sexual connotations.
Read the blog MORANS:
"I imagined a Playboy comprised solely of articles, devoid of nudity (or images of any kind) — something that people would have no choice but to read. In the same way it was regarded as progressive and irreverent in the past, so too could it be now, with an effective and drastic restructuring. Strangely enough, the boundaries Playboy pushed back in the 60’s have now come to be relatively standard operating procedure for men’s magazines. A drastic change, such as eliminating nude spreads altogether, would be one of the ways Playboy could once again be on the forefront exciting editorial content."


- View thread



