rebranding Playboy

Out of context: Reply #10

• Started
• Last post
• 56 Responses

• Khurram0

  Eugh, he was getting AWAY from the overtly sexual connotations.

  Read the blog MORANS:

  "I imagined a Playboy comprised solely of articles, devoid of nudity (or images of any kind) — something that people would have no choice but to read. In the same way it was regarded as progressive and irreverent in the past, so too could it be now, with an effective and drastic restructuring. Strangely enough, the boundaries Playboy pushed back in the 60’s have now come to be relatively standard operating procedure for men’s magazines. A drastic change, such as eliminating nude spreads altogether, would be one of the ways Playboy could once again be on the forefront exciting editorial content."

  Khurram 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • MORANS?woowah
  • MO-RANS.Khurram
  • Go USA!Douglas
  • morans ref for those that need it: http://memewatch.com…jaylarson

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread