banner ad question?
- Started
- Last post
- 9 Responses
- harlequino0
Sure, agencies and clients frequently have metrics compiled showing more clicks to an animated ad over a static one.
- whatsup0
imagine one static black square and another that faded back and forth from black and white. You can put this on google analytics and see which one gets more clicks.
then run a test to see which people actually remember an hour later.
- plash0
it was Advertising Age and you're gonna have to join their subscription to see the demographic matrix. http://adage.com/datacenter/
sorry cant help you out with that.
- unfortunately demographic information is terribly expensiveplash
- plash0
adweek a few months back had some interesting data. i'll see if i can find it. for the mean time; here is their resource link.
http://www.adweek.com/aw/data-ce…
- whatsup0
or a story...
- whatsup0
Using animation, one can easily hide and unhide large groups of information. Making the delivery of the message easier to understand. Many people think that just having animation alone is the in your face technique that will gain the desired attention. When in fact, it's merely only being used to communicate a message
- oktalk0
I'm pretty sure the click through rate is considerably higher for rich media ads versus static.
- tasty0
my company runs tracking pixels and other testing on everything we run. There is no major difference.
Animated helps with heavy messaging in banners though.
- i_monk0
I wish I could install AdBlock Plus at work.
- ksv123
Is there any evidence showing the benefit of animated banner ads vs static?