Skip to main content

Google Chrome OS - 2010 3434 Responses

Last post: 2 years, 9 months ago | Thread started: Jul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

  • BannedKappa

    Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome.

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/0…

    Wow. So remember all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away. You thought they might with the launch of Android, it’s mobile OS, but they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.

    Jul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m. – Permalink
  • BannedKappa

    This is huge!

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m. – Permalink
  • jaylarson

    You're fast. I was just going to post this. Got a hemi in yr brain too?

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 10:36 p.m. – Permalink
  • jaylarson

    Does Chrome have any problems that need hacks?

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 10:37 p.m. – Permalink
  • kgvs72

    Chrome OS is still using linux os as its underlying foundation.

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 10:53 p.m. – Permalink
  • moth

    I hate the way that the author focused completely on this decimating Microsoft like they're the only company running traditional operating systems.

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 11:22 p.m. – Permalink
  • moth

    Why would anyone bother "installing" it when it will run in "any standards-compliant browser on any OS"?

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 11:24 p.m. – Permalink
  • utopian

    I smell a bomb...

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 7, 09, 11:24 p.m. – Permalink
  • version3

    kerpowee!

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 12:19 a.m. – Permalink
  • Stugoo

    lots and lots of pitfalls...
    lets see how it evolves

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 2:29 a.m. – Permalink
  • fiesta

    this would be great... if a home level router existed that didn't freak out and require a couple of refreshes every 70 page views or so

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:32 a.m. – Permalink
  • benfal99

    its true, today a computer without internet connection is mostly useless.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:39 a.m. – Permalink
  • benfal99

    but will it run our softwares? like Photoshop?

    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:40 a.m. – Permalink
  • Nairn

    When this is aimed squarely at the mobile tech midpoint between netbook and mobile phone, this is indeed a very big thing.

    Whatever becomes that standard, becomes The Standard for the next 10 years.

    I think it's kind of fair to single MS out here - Linux doesn't have brand leader focusing on mobile, Apple competes on its own terms, apparently uninterested in licensing its OS to other platforms, so is irrelevant. It's only MS that's made a point of attempting to interject itself into this sphere, far from its own, at the cost of great, open adoption.

    I mean - XP is the choice of platform for netbooks? Windows mobile for handhelds? c'mon.

    • and Symbian et al seem inherently bottlenecked, from what (admittedly, little) I understand.Nairn1/2
      WinCE s a joke too.... ever tried to actually use a WinCE device?vaxorcist2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:42 a.m. – Permalink
  • Nairn

    So, I've just read the article - basically - this is essentially a browser on steroids, running on a Linux shell?

    Meaning that ALL it runs is The Browser. Meaning that all the computer's resources are dedicated to the html and Javascript interface, whilst any complicated stuff goes server-side.

    ... Meaning - the future's an even better time to be a webhead.

    Hmm. Interesting. I wish I was better at JQuery...

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:49 a.m. – Permalink
  • trooperbill

    if it works like thin client where all the cpu is handled server side then we could all experience super high rez games without the need to beef up ram of gfx cards...which would be nice.

    • Roll on 500ms latency!Nairn1/2
      Playing FPS games with latency... uh huuuuuuh..vaxorcist2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:01 a.m. – Permalink
  • moth

    Can't see it making a single dent in the huge market that is corporate IT infrastructure.

    In those terms, this is not even worthy of being called 'competition'.

    • And the iPhone is a footnote?Nairn1/3
      It might... but too many IT dudes are afraid of being laid off, so they'll stick to those Exchange servers and Winblows boxen forever...vaxorcist2/3
      and?404NotFound3/3
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:12 a.m. – Permalink
  • moth

    Fuck the iPhone. Mobiles have been doing everything it does for years already. Only now it's fashionable.

    I fail to see how the iPhone is relevant at all.

    • so why is it the most used mobile platform for online browsing?raf1/2
      the iphone is pretty lovely, I have to say. But we all know Apple is holding back the technology they have.juhls2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:15 a.m. – Permalink
  • Nairn

    It's a consumer device. Google gets most of its money from consumers. I wouldn't imagine Google give a hoot about the corporate sector right now - why bother? They just need to ... reparadigmatize ... web interaction, then if there's a need, corporate will follow suit in a decade or so. Probably not though.

    My point is merely that this move is nothing to do with corporate,

    Let MS further dash themselves against the rocks of Sun or Oracle - that's not Google's cause.

    • The web's people and money, in't?Nairn1/2
      If google can sabotage MS's Cash Cow, then MS can't subsidize things like Bingvaxorcist2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:18 a.m. – Permalink
  • Corvo2

    If it's based on Linux, it'll be as huge as Linux is today. The lack of competitive/dedicated Linux applications is what keeps Linux as a nerdy OS, not Microsoft. As to online apps, I think it's a step down from the independence users have today and will probably mean that raw computer power will be severely diminished - at least at the house-hold level.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:43 a.m. – Permalink
  • Nairn

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/0…

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:52 a.m. – Permalink

Login or Register to respond to this

Skip to main content