Public Voice Network
- FUCK BING! 55
- Google+ 432432
- Proper techno 609609
- Pic of the Day 7535575355
- News of the day... 709709
- Logo of the Day 166166
- Sydney NT drinks 5353
- Chickens in Design? 1616
- the gif animation thread 1878418784
- Official NSFW Thread 289289
- Smartisan OS 99
- Soundcloud 152152
- Architecture of the Day 448448
- Hand Drawn Cocks. 1010
- Gay thread 134134
- I ❤ Wood 347347
- Music Video in 2013 (NSFW… 55
- T-shirt of the day 220220
- QBNTPhE 2013 9494
- Vid of the Day 1527715277
- iTunes 11 7878
- blog 5784757847
- Chick of the Day 1830818308
- Best time to go to Vegas 2525
Google Chrome OS - 2010 3434 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 9 months ago | Thread started: Jul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m.
- BannedKappa
Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/0…
Wow. So remember all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away. You thought they might with the launch of Android, it’s mobile OS, but they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.
- Jul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m. – Permalink
- BannedKappa
This is huge!


- Dog-earJul 7, 09, 10:34 p.m. – Permalink
- Nairn
When this is aimed squarely at the mobile tech midpoint between netbook and mobile phone, this is indeed a very big thing.
Whatever becomes that standard, becomes The Standard for the next 10 years.
I think it's kind of fair to single MS out here - Linux doesn't have brand leader focusing on mobile, Apple competes on its own terms, apparently uninterested in licensing its OS to other platforms, so is irrelevant. It's only MS that's made a point of attempting to interject itself into this sphere, far from its own, at the cost of great, open adoption.
I mean - XP is the choice of platform for netbooks? Windows mobile for handhelds? c'mon.


- Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:42 a.m. – Permalink
- Nairn
So, I've just read the article - basically - this is essentially a browser on steroids, running on a Linux shell?
Meaning that ALL it runs is The Browser. Meaning that all the computer's resources are dedicated to the html and Javascript interface, whilst any complicated stuff goes server-side.
... Meaning - the future's an even better time to be a webhead.
Hmm. Interesting. I wish I was better at JQuery...

- Dog-earJul 8, 09, 4:49 a.m. – Permalink
- trooperbill
if it works like thin client where all the cpu is handled server side then we could all experience super high rez games without the need to beef up ram of gfx cards...which would be nice.


- Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:01 a.m. – Permalink
- Nairn
It's a consumer device. Google gets most of its money from consumers. I wouldn't imagine Google give a hoot about the corporate sector right now - why bother? They just need to ... reparadigmatize ... web interaction, then if there's a need, corporate will follow suit in a decade or so. Probably not though.
My point is merely that this move is nothing to do with corporate,
Let MS further dash themselves against the rocks of Sun or Oracle - that's not Google's cause.


- Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:18 a.m. – Permalink
- Corvo2
If it's based on Linux, it'll be as huge as Linux is today. The lack of competitive/dedicated Linux applications is what keeps Linux as a nerdy OS, not Microsoft. As to online apps, I think it's a step down from the independence users have today and will probably mean that raw computer power will be severely diminished - at least at the house-hold level.


- Dog-earJul 8, 09, 5:43 a.m. – Permalink


