Ouch, Burn.
- Started
- Last post
- 54 Responses
- Greedo0
all that kewpie doll shit, especially with a sexual context, makes me incredibly uncomfortable. too pedophilic. the japanese and their incredibly strange wank-off dolls are a troubled people...
not to generalize, or anything.- sound like someone has some unresolved issuesflashbender
- yeah, i'm a prudeGreedo
- chossy0
All she has done is copy the faces right?..... just the faces and a little bit of the hair, the rest of the environment she has created is hers?...... I guess the focus of the images are the face, but ocht I don't know fuck her she's probably shit nuts anyway yo!
- JackRyan0
I wonder if Mark Ryden has ever gotten a cease and desist from Christina Ricci?
- jgilmore0
how surreal Ive got a little tear away calender with illustrations on and today's is her work.
- chossy0
Thing is though if I were to be insired by the dolls I would be changing nearly every aspect of the face after I had innitially copied it, so I would create a base image which would be my copy then I would set about trying to change it into something else, hopefully that made sense.
- Branchuchan0
It is simply indescribable, as a BJD collector and makeup artist, to sit and watch this unfold. It's like a bad dream, where every day more and more tracings are found. Mijn is a thief of the lowest caliber and deserves to loose whatever reputation or gallery shows or what have you that she has coming. Maybe she should have thought about this before ripping off prominent members of the BJD community or decided to trace every single thing she seems to "draw". Even the tiger found in two of her works is traced!
- albaba0
yep !
and forget about Van Gogh, poor Van Gogh, what's the thing with him, let him rest in peace :)
and forget also about Picasso, i think (for my own point of view), when he was saying ‘good artists copy, great artists steal’, he was meaning "appropriating", in'it ? taking it, and making its own.
But i'm not an artist.
Her art IS work of art, but SHE is not an artist.
who knows
••- it's not like van gogh made any money either. picasso on the other hand was a marketing genius. prick but genius.airey
- ninjasavant0
The important thing to note here is that those dolls are creepy as fuck.
- ukit0
Putting aside the controversy, am I the only one who doesn't see the appeal of this gothic babydoll style of art? I don't get it...
- robotron3k0
she only makes around $1200 per print she sells, why not leave her alone.
- fuckclients0
i was reading this earlier before registering.
this thread, and people like the references artist make me fucking sick to my stomach.