Politics
Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,468 Responses
- yuekit5
Paul Ryan says Trump’s attack on judge was ‘racist,’ but that he still supports him to be President
- Sorry TL, just wanted to post these pictures haha. He's like a cartoon characteryuekit
- YAWNNN!!!!
fucking drekRamanisky2 - dude, who cares if it's a timeline? you pretty much dominate this thread so it's hard to know if it's been posted beforemonospaced
- plus, it's a fact that you and someone else seem to "ignore" ;) hence, it deserves repostingmonospaced
- nb4
- yuekit3
Trump orders surrogates to double down on attacking Latino judge over his race, overruling his own campaign
"We will overcome," said Trump.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politic…
Trump surrogate says Paul Ryan is racist for calling Trump racist
- lol...what a shitshow
Are we really sure Trump isn't a plant by the Clintons?yuekit - what a spectacular shitshowRamanisky2
- lol...what a shitshow
- IRNlun6-3
I know many of you all will hate the source, but most media will not report this as anything more than a racial tirade by Trump.
There's more info by the day that shows this judge and organizations he belongs to shows serious conflicts of interest.
- The organization called for a boycott of his businesses. Not illegal or a conflict of interest.nb
- The judge who happens to be a member of the organization calling for a boycott of his businesses, is serving for the litigation of one of Trumps businesses.IRNlun6
- Are judges not allowed to be members of political organizations? Is it frowned upon? I'm legitimately asking.nb
- Turns out these orgs are also listed on the La Raza website. Although a link on a website is not a direct connection, still suspect.IRNlun6
- http://larazalawyers…IRNlun6
- screenshot for if they delete it... https://pbs.twimg.co…IRNlun6
- From my understanding, they can be members of any political org, but have a code of ethics to recuse themselves if there's any potential conflict.IRNlun6
- I just read on a gov site that judges shouldn't be official "leaders" of the organizations, and that they shouldn't give speeches for them. Membership seemed oknb
- The other media wouldn't report it because it's not much of an actual story.yuekit
- He is a member of a legal group that is "affiliated" with another group that said negative things about Trumpyuekit
- Not just any group though, it's the Hispanic National Bar Association.IRNlun6
- One way or another thus judge is absolutely biased. Give me a break. Jfcdrake-von-drake
- oh, so you've resorted to pure opinion for your argument now... fucking patheticmonospaced
- monospaced4
Simple fact: San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association ≠ National Council of La Raza.
- Haven't read anything with any direct connections but they are linked on the website I linked below. The optics are not good.IRNlun6
- Plus if they wanted to avoid any confusion, perhaps "La Raza" was not the best choice of words.IRNlun6
- The optics don't look good if you're on trumps side but the fact is that they aren't the same and the affiliation isn't Curiels.monospaced
- Thanks for clearing that up, mono!nb
- also a gang. http://sheepshead.wp…yurimon
- Very good yuri. They're also not a gang.monospaced
- Maybe it's a California thing but I don't know any hispanics outside of Mexico/Central America that would call their themselves La Raza. That's pretty specific.IRNlun6
- Especially a group of lawyers who should absolutely know what that means.IRNlun6
- haha condescending cunt.yurimon
- i wouldn't trust this guy irniun6. he defended margret sangers racism in defending hitlery. end justifies the means.yurimon
- Not about trust yuri. I can only can say what I know or what I've read. I can't worry about things that are out of my control.IRNlun6
- 2% Navajo, you sound so confused and scared. The big brown Mexicans are gonna get you at night. lol. I rather like watching you struggle with it.sofakingback
- La Raza has been used for years in the states by hispanics fighting for their rights against racists like you. That probably why you never heard of it. ;)sofakingback
- i think you are more of a racist. funny how that works out.yurimon
- La Raza is a supremacist organization that calls for the reconquest of the West. Us hispanics don't universally call ourselves La Raza, we know what it means.IRNlun6
- No, I have black friends... and one white guy thats 10% puerto rican and 2% navajo. So top that.sofakingback
- I grew up in South America.IRNlun6
- Everybody that is street smart knows the feeling you get when you say la raza,yurimon
- fuck you for calling me racist, you asshole. despite using the same word, the two aren't the same. period.monospaced
- 1, you arent street smart for sure. 2. I wasnt referring to anyone specific, but thanks for volunteering yourself. 3 i been around la raza street types.yurimon
- i know what it is to say it to certain peeps.yurimon
- I'm from Southern California, I know what La Raza is. But still, what it "sounds like" means NOTHING. The two orgs aren't related, and neither is the judge.monospaced
- That's a fact. Period.monospaced
- https://www.youtube.…yurimon
- I'm 10% more chicano than 99% ofyurimon
- perhaps... but you're 100% WRONG that the San Diego Latino Bar Association (scholarship fund) is associated with La Razamonospaced
- factmonospaced
- I know all the best Hispanics, 100% more than all of you. Believe me nobody knows Hispanics like me.sofakingback
- BusterBoy5
This thread is a perfect example of why America is a total cluster fuck. With cockheads like drake-von-arseclown being the norm on the right, it's no wonder Washington is a total rabble, having to pander to the intellectual midgets.
- is there anything specific you can comment on in what he said in his political posts or you dont have time for that as well. but have time to call people namesyurimon
- for their political views that most of you fail to analyze or refute. common practice in assie nowa days? brown shirting?yurimon
- ironic that people who support diversity and rights for people are the first to name drop, low blow, get offended and want your rights revoked if not of theiryurimon
- liking according to PC rules of fake cotton candy morality. feel good surface fluff but nasty and hitleresque in nature.yurimon
- oh my fuck urinemon, people do not have to justify their dislike for someone. fuck off.imbecile
- In-fucking-Sufferabl...Ramanisky2
- well that would contradict everything he stands for politically right?yurimon
- If you can't even acknowledge Trump's racism, no point trying to argue logically.BusterBoy
- trump talk like regular new york person. unbecoming the facade you see in politics. maybe hes racist i dont know, you dont know. maybe he talk shit like mostyurimon
- people on here. he doesnt comment on things like hes in a vacuum. he might not say it right or his words are exaggerated in the trust worthy media. but for theyurimon
- most part there are real concerns in what he brings up that are not easily dismissed by the logically challenged as racist.yurimon
- what you guys are doing is trying to mask issues. This PC stuff needs to die so we can have real conversation. there are real statistical concerns and commonyurimon
- sense is being put in the dumpster in talking about what really is going on. but i understand if you tell someone something strait and they emotionallyyurimon
- cant handle the strait talk. take everything personally while acting and being part of hypocritical belief systems they made up or conditioned to believe.yurimon
- because it makes them feel like they are doing something right to feel good when its not. thats the PC poison.yurimon
- yuri all drake does is call people names when they interact with him, even when they're not!monospaced
- Trump & all the Trumpites are trying to legitimise all the bile that spews from this fool's mouth. You have no idea how dangerous that is...BusterBoy
- im not talking about when he calls people names obviously. busterboy, go look at your gov who sold you out the same. solve our own countries problemsyurimon
- aussie is going to shyit the same,yurimon
- Ignorance is bliss.drake-von-drake
- Riiiiight drek-e-poo ...
RiiiiiiightRamanisky2 - Hillary has our back in much the same way Brutus had Caesar's back.drake-von-drake
- Fucking
drek-von-drekRamanisky2 - yes you are, yuri, it's LITERALLY the first thing you wrote, that he is calling namesmonospaced
- Ramanisky22
Good luck GOP
- lolmoldero
- the designer of the cover knocked the red/yellow in the saturation adjustment layer -85% at leastRamanisky2
- https://www.youtube.…moldero
- Ahhhh
Fucking drek-e-pooRamanisky2 - Riiiiiight drek-e-poo,
RiiiiightRamanisky2 - Awwww
Little drek-e-pooRamanisky2 - Hilarious, drek-e-pooRamanisky2
- BusterBoy2
Going by Trump's retarded racist bullshit logic, any "white anglo" judge must be automatically biased against any Mexican/Latino...cos Donald is going to build a waaaaaaall. A great, yuuuuge waaaaaall.
Let me know how this all works out for you...
- lvl_132
drake-von-drake, we get your point of view. It's boring. If you actually have a point-of-view please share it. Who will you be voting for? Why?
- Fuck that. I couldn't give a stuff what he thinks or who he's going to vote for.BusterBoy
- drek-von-troll speakethRamanisky2
- Ohhh, good one drekRamanisky2
- CygnusZero40
Glad to do my part voting for her in NJ. She beat the shit out of that old corpse last night. So much for his 'movement'. Lmao. Keep making excuses. The people have spoken, and chose her.
- If people dont like her, good for them, thats just their opinion, which is very clear now is way down in the minority. Many people like her.CygnusZero4
- Dont give a shit about some EMAILS lmfao. Dumbest story ever when many previous secretaries did it this way.CygnusZero4
- Is she your favorite criminal or you have other criminals you like? just curious.yurimon
- my favorite criminal is Trumpdrgs
- sup herd you like criminalsyurimon
- lolzzzz @ criminal. good one!CygnusZero4
- how about that time she visited serbia and claimed to have landed under sniper fire and had to run to an armored car only for pictures surface of her hanging outerry_cloth
- t on the tarmac smiling and taking pictures with children. she is a pathological liar, she can't help itterry_cloth
- Hillary has our back in much the same way Brutus had Caesar's back.drake-von-drake
- women can't be criminals... yuri... you're funny :)PonyBoy
- new jersey is no surprise
http://tosh.cc.com/b…moldero - ^ with that many oompa loompas there's no way trump doesn't take NJPonyBoy
- Deja vu here... Drake, I think we had this conversation not long ago, about so definitively calling her a criminal, yet she's never been found guiltymg33
- of a criminal act in a court of law. So, to be truthful, she isn't a criminal; she's just under suspicion of committing criminal acts. There's a difference.mg33
- ben_2
I'm legitimately curious about what rationale people have for planning to vote either way right now.
Does anyone have any really concrete reasons why they'd vote for Trump outside of vague notions that "he's different" from other politicians?
Same question on Hillary, outside of her being the the only other possible option right now, what policies speak to you?
Mind you both have been caught lying multiple times, or at least shifting their positions significantly to a degree that it's caused distrust among a great many people. So what really breaks through the noise with these two that speaks to you guys?
- Raised a great family, built a world wide business, called out the globalists, Americans first, against identity politics/victim culture.IRNlun6
- /\ Nothing about policy?ben_
- policy is what you want to hear according to marketing principles for you to buy it for her to get elected. If elected, policy flows where money goes.yurimon
- Non-interventionist foreign policy, strong national defense, renegotiating trade policies, to name just a few.IRNlun6
- Can't enact any policy without the house and senate so specifics are really just promises at this point.IRNlun6
- @IRN, yeah the last comment is totally fair, so do you think either can really make good on their promises? IMO they both seem like liars, and choosingben_
- ...the better liar seems pretty depressing.ben_
- I think personally trump hates inefficiency on gov operations as his dealings with the city has proven. I dont hillery has much of backbone so hard to tell.yurimon
- Regardless of the policy you want to hear, I think it's clear that Trump is lacking in understanding of the major policies that impact the US and the world.mg33
- So many things he's rattling on about are leaving smarter people baffled as to why he'd pull a 180 on so many things. Climate change, deals with allies, etc.mg33
- I can understand a candidate's desire to change the status quo, but it's so widespread with Trump that many see it as quite dangerous and troubling.mg33
- Trump and Bernie ran on pretty much the same issues. Although clearly with different temperaments and government/less government ideas.IRNlun6
- I think many are accustomed to a very diplomatic, very pc way of politicians presenting themselves and are uncomfortable with a brash, unapologetic style.IRNlun6
- I like Bernie, I just find pc and nice to be too cautious when this country is being chopped up and sold. They're both relatively similar on the problems.IRNlun6
- FUCK HILLARY.drake-von-drake
- ah, there's it is, thanks drakemonospaced
- OLIGARCHYdrake-von-drake
- all caps! calm down, take a breath little buddymonospaced
- nb4
@ben_ Here's one example of why Hillary is a better choice:
Hillary: I want half a billion solar panels installed. I want to power all US homes with renewable energy within 10 years.
Trump: "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
- That's what I'm looking for. It would be good to understand people's understanding of the policies.ben_
- /\ and less of this.ben_
- policies go where the money tells it to go with clinton /endyurimon
- You'll notice that people like yurimon & drake can't argue on policy, they can only give vague platitudes and generalizations. It's common.nb
- I'm a little worried that there's only one real response so far.ben_
- i dont think clintons policy matters just like last administrations policy promises matter compared to results. waste of typing.yurimon
- you guys want to masterbate to details of marketing schemes to get votes be my guest.yurimon
- I don't disagree with you that politicians in general don't hold true to their policies, but within all these posts it's super unclear as to why anyone wouldben_
- How is half a billion solar panels installed a good thing? the second statement is a blanket im not even going to concern myself with...deathboy
- vote for someone like Trump or Clinton. Seems like the options are pretty brutal either way, which is I guess why it descends into bickering.ben_
- Will the poor be able to maintain them and the infrastructure needed? will an artificial increase in solar demand increase other energy costs where solar isdeathboy
- unavailable. i'll humor the statement but i'd very much like to see a real hypothesis as to why it is "good". i knwo there was jsut a PR job open for a solar codeathboy
- to lobby teachers to teach all green technology is good to grade school kids and thats simply it. just teach its good. glad the person didnt take itdeathboy
- http://image.prntscr…terry_cloth
- believing anything that hillary says, an I will never understand the hive mind. OBAMA: I Will close guantanamo, etc,etc ...GeorgesII
- Nuclear isn't safe on fault lines, nor is it a long term energy solution. Do you have a better idea for energy needs? Honest question.nb
- do you value good for environment over good for standard of living of people?deathboy
- i actually believe the invisible hand of the free market would be best for everyone. im not opposed to any alternative energy but im skeptical of an energy bubbdeathboy
- I might argue that "good for environment" is also good for standard of living, long term. Anyway, how does adding solar reduce the standard of living?nb
- le. look at what we did to diesal. while europe prospered in that tech. i think renewables are just aspirational branding by politiciansdeathboy
- if it increases cost for poor people who cant use solar. artifical demands have the tendency to create negative consequences in other sectorsdeathboy
- right now solar in nevada is hurting everyone not using it because they all have to subsidize it. why elon is getting the bootdeathboy
- anyways. jsut dont take such statements for granted unless they really have a good hypothesis. think she has a prediction on job losses in ten years?deathboy
- these people know no better than anyone. why i believe everyone knows better and them serving self interests has proven to work out pretty welldeathboy
- The idea that US energy production has been a result of the free market is simply inaccurate. There has always been govt intervention.nb
- of course. a purely free market is simply an ideal to strive for. but where ther eis gov intervention look at the consequences adn bubble vs where there wasntdeathboy
- and im not an anarchist. the gov has a role in providing for the protection for the people. certain EPA measures are good, but a lot are also over killdeathboy
- you can regulate to the point the returns aren't worth it. where regulation is more harmful. again everything needs to be looked at objectivelydeathboy
- Right. Shifting incentives from nuclear to solar should be looked at objectively. Don't assume that adding solar means "more" regulation. :)nb
- nuclear has only had regulations and hurdles, where as solar has only had subsidizations. big differences. gov is picking solar as a winnerdeathboy
- and im skeptical if they are picking correctly. again let people decide. look back at regulatiosn after 3 mile and see if they are to constrictingdeathboy
- seem if it was regulated to death, and if the regulations were created out of politcial posturing.deathboy
- I removed 3 of 4 cats in my exhaust (no smog county registration) increase in HP-Torq + 8mi to the gallon. Better off.deathboy
- GeorgesII-5
First time I was wrong in this race,
i predicted president Trump would only get 1400,
feels good
- robotron3k-1
she's gonna win alright...
- lol. That photo isn't even either of them.
http://www.snopes.co…kona - https://cdn.meme.am/…kona
- how embarrassing robotron3kRamanisky2
- dude, you're what's wrong with your "party" seriouslymonospaced
- has The Orange Asshole tweeted this yet??
I expect he will.Ramanisky2 - the RealOrangeAsshole? no idea, i don't use twittermonospaced
- someone should tweet this pic to him and see if he retweets it.Ramanisky2
- lol @ drakeoey
- Yes it does Drake! Except for the her eye color being wrong, too tall, wider face, different hair style and color. Other than that though, just like her.kona
- lol konaRamanisky2
- definitely the same boobies Drake.fadein11
- Dead spitting image. She must be pandering to her constituencies.drake-von-drake
- lol. That photo isn't even either of them.
