Politics

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,466 Responses
  • Ramanisky25

  • dbloc4

  • BonSeff1

    • plant more pot treezmoldero
    • i like this guy. glad he got his 5% for 2020omg
    • Fuck reporters and their personal agendas_niko
    • to sum up he gets upset that ppl say his tax plan is upset and compares those ppl to the majority also saying legalizing marijuana is bad.deathboy
    • friedman was about consumption tax + negative income tax, but said gov wouldn't never go for it because it took politicians power away to sell favorsdeathboy
    • garys right. just not eloquent about how he says it. ppl prefer eloquent and wrong unfortunately. probably the way advertising has us geareddeathboy
  • dbloc6

  • utopian6

    Trump University staff included drug trafficker, child molester

    Donald Trump says he hand-picked only the best to teach success at Trump University. But dozens of those hired by the company had checkered pasts - including serious financial problems and even convictions for cocaine trafficking or child molestation, an Associated Press investigation has found.

    http://www.fox28.com/story/33498…

    • https://www.youtube.…utopian
    • Donald Drumpf hand picked these child molesters, drug dealers and career criminals...make MurikkkA Great again!utopian
    • they were just kidding though, so it's finemonospaced
    • He was just being sarcastic.allthethings
    • he was just being an equalled opportunity employer. child molesters need jobs too.omg
    • omfgmoldero
    • let's not forget these others who were jailed for non-violent drug crimes.omg
    • The Justice Department is set to release about 6,000 inmates early from prison between Oct30 - Nov 2omg
    • @omg that's a good thing, but that doesn't mean they should be respectable professors eithermonospaced
  • since19795

    • I know the guy that did this.teh
    • this is fantastic. and the hairpins are a wonderful touch.kona
    • alien says, "what species is that fetus?"omg
  • sted4

    Carmageddon Max Damage :D

    • give them weapons, and let them kill each other.omg
  • Dillinger-6

  • face_melter3

    Trump even fabricates his golf handicap.

    https://www.theguardian.com/spor…

    Running at 3 / 2.8. Not bad for a flabby 70yo with child hands.

    • good work sherlock. relevance 1.2yurimon
    • *chucklemonospaced
    • http://i0.wp.com/www…omg
    • Don the Conmoldero
    • "Not bad for a flabby 70yo with child hands" - lolfadein11
    • I bet yurimon has tiny hands. Like really tiny - like barbie hands.fadein11
    • This has got all the qbn male-feminists in a hissy fit! "How dare he!"robotron3k
    • robo not only thinks women are inferior to men, he also hates anyone who thinks they are equal and calls them feminists. What a backwards fuck.monospaced
    • Sorry dude. You know it's true. You've said it yourself and this little jab you made about QBNers is just more proof of it. So sad.monospaced
    • Women are different, mentally and physically from men. I know this might be a big surprise for you mono. Being in Asia, I am noticing women are much more on parrobotron3k
    • With men as far as work. Many women entrepreneurs abound, I see many women working in construction. I am for equality not feminism. But Western woman createrobotron3k
    • Propaganda of victimization from "the patriarchy". When the patriarchy has actually given them opportunities, they choose weak career choices.robotron3k
    • are you for real robo?fadein11
    • Typically when I meet a feminist they are school teachers or work for non-profit orgs, when they could be scientist, inventor, builder, doctor, but they wantrobotron3k
    • Easy schedules for vacations and attending Ashrams. To me Western feminist are lazy, self indulgent, narcissist. I say, go work construction for true equality.robotron3k
    • But their are many female leaders around, but many lead small countries. And I think the Germans are not saying what they really feel about Merkel.robotron3k
    • Praise from yuri. My life is (almost) complete. For that I would need a signed, naked, photo.face_melter
    • See? I wasn't even kidding.monospaced
  • whatthefunk5

  • utopian4

    California poll: Trump’s numbers dropping into ‘uncharted territory’

    Donald Trump is careening toward a historically poor showing in California, a prospect that has left several GOP congressmen fearful for their seats and Democrats hopeful they can regain a supermajority in the Legislature.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/a65…

  • robotron3k-6

    The power of every major corporation, news outlet and organization some polls show her in slight lead...

    • The Feminists are coming for you robo. They're gonna hunt you down, shave your balls and draw a swastika on your sack.face_melter
    • ^ bwahahafadein11
    • Don't hurt me ladies of QBN... I was triggered!!robotron3k
  • chukkaphob-6

  • sted5

  • CygnusZero48

    I love it when trump supporters are like the polls are all rigged!!! Orly? Take a look at how many outlets there are that do the polls. Youre telling me theyre ALL rigged? Lmao thats not even possible.

    Btw, Hillary has really been cleaning his clock as we get closer to the election. He is only winning polls in a few states, and actually in danger of losing traditionally red states like Arizona, Texas, Georga, Iowa...

    This is why people say he has no path to 270. Not only would he have to clean sweep every single red state, but he would need to win most of the swing states, AND turn some historically blue states to red, like California and New York. Thats sure as shit not happening so its basically impossible for him to win. His supporters are fucking delusional.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com…

    • Meanwhile trump is scheduled to rally in Arizona for A SEVENTH TIME even though that state isn't even critical. He isn't bothering with new voters.monospaced
    • Yeah, but Hillary wears a clown mask and fucks, kills, then eats disabled orphan children while watching torrents of GoT and smoking litres of crack.face_melter
    • Don't forget she is also Islamic and suffering from chronic, terminal epilepsy all while managing to get even the most obscure small town reporter in her pockemonospaced
    • Less polls, more hatsomg
    • ^ tinfoil hatsfadein11
    • You got played omg, it was all just a viral marketing scheme to sell hatsyuekit
    • How many hats did you buy, omg?monospaced
    • wait hold on? you cannot take a poll from people putting their money where their mouth is based on geographical location on FB?omg
    • if the polls say one thing, but Trump gets more than twice the amount of people at his rallies than Hillary. what's that tell you?omg
    • that Trump supporters have lots of free time?BuddhaHat
    • right. it can tell you much more than the polls themselves compared to polls taken by the media.omg
    • this is hard call polls vs crowds. i know people who despise her but still will vote. so much ignorance.yurimon
    • http://i.imgur.com/g…BuddhaHat
    • It tells you that Trump is avoiding places where he is despised (hint, most places), targeting red states for the SOLE purpose of the image and appearance.monospaced
    • @omg, there's no way in hell the turnout at rallies is a better indicator of election results than actual voter responsesmonospaced
    • @omg - it tells me that trump supporters are the type of people who like congregating in large groups, Hillary supporters don't feel the need to because she hasfadein11
    • already won.fadein11
    • maybe or maybe not but one thing remains is you being complete fraud on your ideals. which intern tells me you are not a self aware animal.yurimon
    • your intelligent in the way that communist professors with degrees thought russia was going to be a utopia after you kill a bunch of people who disagree with uyurimon
    • ya, everyone advocating for welfare is going to be running to the polls. "please give us welfare and abortions".omg
    • if a person could plan that fare in advanced for an unexpected kid, most likely they'll not be at the voting booths.omg
    • lol, is that all you got yuri, to point out that in YOUR OPINION people aren't living up to the moral compass that you perceive to be so important? lolmonospaced
    • people at Trump rallies are the doers of the nation.omg
    • dem strategy has been trying to manage people through dependency on gov benefits. so people will always vote dem for that reason.yurimon
    • big problem is Hillary can bring out more pissed off angry women to the polls, and that alone is enough to win the electionomg
    • hahahaha, yeah, having women on her side is definitely good for winning ... it's also the OPPOSITE of riggedmonospaced
    • Hillary will turn the US into a Socialist wonderland where abortions and free cheese will flow through the streets. Children will sing her name.face_melter
    • And all you pencilnecks will be put on a re-education list, where you will be taught The Red Flag, wear the black one and learn how to cook borscht.face_melter
    • face_melter, if you want to go and get an abortion, that's up to you... why should you have the right to choose whether anybody else has one?BuddhaHat
    • she would never do such a thing mono, shes an angel for the people. she is one of us.yurimon
    • get a jobDiIlinger
  • BuddhaHat4

    It's a slightly older article, but relevant to Cygnus' comment above. I don't argue in the slightest that the numbers are looking very good for Hillary Clinton right now, she's very likely to take the White House. As for the success of her proposed legislative agenda, the path forward is a lot less certain.

    http://www.salon.com/2016/04/01/…
    ...
    Enter REDMAP. The RSLC strategists decided to target as many state legislative chambers as they could in 2010, with an eye to maximizing the number of states where they could have total control of drawing new maps the following year. They spent $30 million — a steal when you consider that’s the cost of some Senate races — in local elections in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina, all with the goal of asserting GOP dominance in purple states. They were aided by the fact that 2010 became an anti-Obama wave election and many discouraged Democrats stayed home. But by the end of Election Night 2010, the GOP had attained several hundred new state legislative seats (hitting a decades-long high point) and captured some two-thirds of state legislative chambers nationwide. They pressed that advantage big-time in 2011, using the most advanced map-making and demographic technology ever to super-glue their gains in place.
    ...
    Email records and depositions show the epic lengths the Republicans went to in 2011 to draw maps with the goal of locking in a decade — at least — of House dominance. In court case after court case — whether in Wisconsin, North Carolina, Florida or Texas — or in other states like Ohio where Freedom of Information Act requests have uncovered revelatory email exchanges between operatives and mapmakers, the story is scary for anyone who cares about participatory democracy. In Florida, a federal judge overturned two districts in 2014, ruling that it seemed to him that there was a shadow redistricting process conducted by GOP masterminds. In Wisconsin, even some Republican lawmakers howled at being forced to sign confidentiality agreements to view the new maps, which were constructed, in part, at a law firm across the street from the state capitol. A judge later rejected the idea that attorney-client privilege would allow the mapmakers to keep details of the process private. In Ohio, emails suggested how operatives made changes to maps after receiving last-minute communications from Speaker Boehner’s political team, and how they dubbed their secret redistricting headquarters “The Bunker.”
    ...
    In order to take control Wasserman told USA Today – he really is the expert on this — Democrats would have to win 30 of the 31 seats where a GOP candidate appears “at risk.” Oh, and not lose any seats of their own. Trump or no Trump, that’s a steep hill.

    • only one problem with your logic is that democrats are technically bush. have fun with wwIII. hope you get drafted.yurimon
    • see you on the other side. lolomg
    • lol, as if Trump is a vote for world peacemonospaced
    • he's much more a nationalist than a globalist trying to take over the world.omg
    • has he ever talked tough on global takeover like Hillary?omg
    • if you listen to speeches. his idea is to clean up the mess in partnership. he doesnt see isis as tool for proxy war.yurimon
    • If the democrats are bush, what does that make the GOP? I'm having a hard time coming up with something, seeing as their scumbaggery is unprecedented.BuddhaHat
    • this is a more grounded approach. I could tell when trump lies. 1 thing is sincere is his goal to help the country. he growing into the roll.yurimon
    • And my post drew no logical conclusions other than the House likely not falling the Democrats' way. What utter garbage are you dribbling, yuri?BuddhaHat
    • @omg, yeah, he pretty much has in relation to how he views the oil in the middle eastmonospaced
    • he thinks it's ours and that we (usa) should have the right to bomb anyone and everyone in order to secure it and sell itmonospaced
    • Sometimes what is good doesn't come in an ideal package but gets the job done. if hes elected watch n see.yurimon
    • if not, 4 years a someone who doesnt display empathy and executive privileged of controlling armed forces and nukes.yurimon
    • he doesnt think that at all. it in your head. plus your crazy bitch radar is malfunctioning. you n moldy. moldy know shes a nut bag but hisyurimon
    • 'his goal to help the country' is not sincere, he doesn't know the meaning of the word. Or 'empathy', or 'trade deficit', or 'sharia', or 'proliferation'.BuddhaHat
    • crazy bitch sadistic tendencies support her dont stick you vote in crazy. trump is an asshole but hes not crazy by any standardyurimon
    • Trump in the past has taken the opposite side of basically every issue including globalizationyuekit
    • watch the midd east conflict expand if H gets in. remember what i said.yurimon
    • as well as praising Hillary as a great leader and good friend of his, and being in favor of immigration reform.yuekit
    • He's not crazy, he's neurotic, grandiosely narcissistic, egotistical, angry, a pathological liar, a racist, a misogynist, volatile, a populist...BuddhaHat
    • There has been a reasonable amount of work put into the analysis: http://www.theatlant…BuddhaHat
    • trump is more of pragmatist not based on ideals. i would rather give him a chance based on what he said.yurimon
    • if he is the rep version of ob, all talk no results. i will eat my hat.yurimon
    • Pragmatist would be proposing realistic things, not that we're going to somehow magically kick out all the immigrants and restore 1950s America.yuekit
    • @mono - "take the oil", but a vote for Hillary is a vote for WWIIIomg
    • with all the women pushing for WWIII, I wonder how that will changes things in the military. a bunch of dead guys and babies in the chamber.omg
    • lol, how is she a vote for wwiii?monospaced
    • also, yuri, he does think that, and he has said it clearly several times on national television and in public speechesmonospaced
    • his plan is clear partner with russia against isis, vs proxy war supporting isis which has spread to 33 countries under the proxy war policy which is a hugeyurimon
    • backfire, and causes deaths outside the war zone. horrible idea thinking they could control funding these groups in hope to contain them in the regionyurimon
    • for a proxy war. terrible mistake. yet simple common sense.yurimon
    • Partner with Russia? How many partners does Russia have right now? Do you think Trump is smarter than an ex-KGB billionaire dictator/president?BuddhaHat
    • we will see how things go. the dictator element is the same with both candidates. if she is elected after her experience you will see internet whitewashingyurimon
    • Trump is more of law enforcement type in my opinion. we will see what his tolerances are on reporters.yurimon
  • BonSeff3

    The GOP’s Walking Dead: Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz is the latest proof the Republicans are a Zombie Party

    http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/…

    Looking forward to eight more years of obstruction

    • its one party duffus they just want a piece of the action. trust me there is no obstruction with alot of the legislation like ob care because it was the sameyurimon
    • corp interests. they are equally bought out in key decisions. why they dont want someone not in the party system to rattle the means of how Washington functionyurimon
    • by your logic the party of perceived peace should have ended all wars and poverty.yurimon
    • no it wasn't the same with ob care. dems had presidency, house and senate for 2 years. everything since has been retributionBonSeff
    • how did your vote go yuri? i missed the result.fadein11
    • dems are on track to take back the senate and the house if just going to be butt hurt for eight more years.BonSeff
    • Chaffetz already pledges years and years of investigative hearings.BonSeff
    • you keep saying 'your logic' when they have posted a piece written by someone else, with very little in the way of additional commentBuddhaHat
    • seriously, what are you dribbling about?BuddhaHat
    • actions of your party doesnt equal the ideals most of you are trying to convey. same thing with reps. in the general scheme of thingsyurimon
    • But the actions of the GOP certainly does. Outright obstructionism, divisiveness, no coherent policy of their own, greed, anti-democratic activities...BuddhaHat
    • ^ obviously you missed the bank bail out under ob. and 8 years of current administration special interests authoring legislations.yurimon
    • rhetoric vs action malfunction still pretty strong in political circles of people clinging to party names. some people think Mercedes is stil a good car.yurimon
    • the brand vs the reality. i dont know how people could get out of it.yurimon
    • http://dailysignal.c…BonSeff
    • As soon as the tea party took the house majority it became a shit show. throwing up bills they knew would get vetoed for showmanshipBonSeff
    • shit like cruz reading dr seuss to filibuster with zero end game. 40-something bills to repeal aca. gimme a break.BonSeff
    • tea party didnt take the house, tea party was taken over in hope of squashing 3rd party grassroots movement. just like hills tried to co opt n absorb theyurimon
    • bernie grassroots. its a common practice in the 2 party system in making things into clown shows and keeping good ideas looking ridiculous in the mainstreamyurimon
    • whatever, keep blathering. history proves you wrong
      http://www.theatlant…
      BonSeff
    • you don't actually answer any direct questions, yuri, you just keep spewing garbage and hope that some of it will stick.BuddhaHat
    • 'special interests' authoring legislation is a GOP specialty, I don't know where you're going with that. Like attaching anti-abortion bills to emergency fundingBuddhaHat
    • its been all the same. dont give me dems this reps this, this logic died 2004 after ob election. perception vs a bleak realityyurimon
    • bleak how?BonSeff
    • cause it's not the 1950's anymore?BonSeff
    • logic died after the ob election because the GOP said 'we're going to be obstinate man-children and have a giant tantrum and bring the country to a halt'BuddhaHat
    • no because you still dont cant see the hypocrisy in your political stance. its the equivalent of believing media false rhetoric while reality is different.yurimon
    • and basically haven't had a feasible policy alternative on a single thing in 8 yearsBuddhaHat
    • it happens when people view problems with preconceived notions, viewsyurimon
    • You can thank Mr Boehner, Ryan, McConnell et al for that particular clusterfuck.BuddhaHat
    • dude, with a self reflecting username come great self reflection, change your user name to just hat. comparatively they all suck that why you need a trumpyurimon
    • character, where the better possibility of change exists from the current path. if im wrong lets conclude the system is broken no matter what.yurimon
    • it's a username from a book character, nothing more, thanks for asking. Your 'comparatively...' argument is pissweak.BuddhaHat
    • The 'character' argument is even worse. The candidate chosen by GOP voters only barely qualifies as a hominid, as he has tiny, opposable thumbs.BuddhaHat
    • you keep confusing intelligence and wisdom. you maybe intelligent but your conversation lacks wisdom and big picture foresight.yurimon
    • you are just as much duped in last 2 elections of OB and how your party has contributed to the decline, war, etc. which in tern is bush policy.yurimon
    • congratulations on being a rep dressed in dem clothing.yurimon
    • and you may be verbose, rambling and mostly incoherent, but your argument also lacks evidenceBuddhaHat
    • you are just as much duped by the opponents of OB's election, and their denial of their contribution to the decline, war, etc which IN TURN is a Bush policy.BuddhaHat
    • i know what works better. i would like to see what would happen under trump. if screws up their is a better chance for a 3rd party birth.yurimon
    • no need for more parties, right is rightDiIlinger
  • monospaced4

    "We go in, we spent $3 trillion. We lose thousands and thousands of lives, and then look, what happens is we get nothing. You know, it used to be the victor belong the spoils," Trump told NBC News' Matt Lauer. "Now, there was no victor there, believe me. There was no victory. But I always said, take the oil." — Trump

    • So what is the point of the conflict in your opinion. enlighten me. he referring to how much $ was spent for nothing. obviously you are not nykeryurimon
    • my point is that he intends to not only keep occupying forces, but to pillage a nation of resources that are rightfully on their landmonospaced
    • my point is that he should not be confused with a candidate for peace and order ... his ambitions are money and greed and war, just like anyone elsemonospaced
    • omg keeps saying a vote for hillary is a vote for war, but honestly, I see nothing different from the Trump side, that's allmonospaced
    • difference is trump, clean up the war.
      H, business as usual, one problem to proceed, you need war with russia.
      yurimon
    • its good point on pillage, aspect. state vs corp. but doesnt answer the question what was the point of the conflict?yurimon
    • "clean up the war"fadein11
    • it appears the later of the status quo is not only pillage the mid east but also pillage the people at home as you are stuck with the bill.yurimon
    • noticed Trump did not say fund ISIS, blow up shit in order to take the oil. That is not how a business man thinks. However Trump will defend law and order.omg
    • pretty logical, to ask what are the consequences of actions and what you get out of it vs problems when he disagreed with the invasionyurimon
    • ummm, take the oil is "business" and it's war, which is "as usual." Hillary is not in favor of more occupying forces. C'mon!monospaced
    • 'that is not how a business man thinks' - and what a businessman he is... he'd be worth $8b if he just invested his daddy's money.BuddhaHat
    • Trump's net worth, reflected by his name being removed from future hotels under his control, is worth considerably less.BuddhaHat
    • I can tell you follow a lot of that mainstream garbage. That's like listening to mainstream dance thinking that's good techno house music.omg
    • BuddhaHat was a big fan of New Kids on the Block back in his day.omg
    • sorry, what "mainstream garbage" did I reference? this is based on what the candidates have actually said.monospaced
    • no, that's not at all what it's like. His name WAS going to be on these hotels, now it isn't. Because his brand is toxic.BuddhaHat
    • I'd accuse you of making a false equivalency, but I'm not sure you'd know what that is.BuddhaHat
    • mono (oxford comma) its your views ffs.yurimon
    • he risked his reputation in trying to give back to the country. he realizes it in a current speech. if he get a chance to govern we will see who is right.yurimon
    • I like the New Kids reference, omg... did you look around your bedroom, see your Donnie Wahlberg poster, and then come up with that?BuddhaHat
    • @yuri, he risked what? he didn't have a good reputation before this, and now he's pretty much ruined his brand for goodmonospaced
    • Donnie who?! LOL is that one of the dudes on New Kids on the Block?omg
    • I knew it. you were dancing in your bedroom to them while were were all at the clubs pimpin'omg
    • Who's 'were were'? is that some hip underground group I don't know about?BuddhaHat
  • monospaced5

    Trump, July 8: I would take away their wealth. I would take away the oil. What you should be doing now is taking away the oil.

    Cooper: What does that mean?

    Trump: Bomb them. And I’ll tell you what I hate about this question. If I win – if I win. I didn’t want to answer this question. And I thought maybe I could go without answering it. Because if you look at the great General George Patton, or General MacArthur, I was a big fan of, any of this great general. They didn’t talk about what they did. And I said I hate it. In fact, if you remember when I said I have a plan, but I don’t want to talk about it. Everyone said, oh, he really doesn’t have a plan. So, I had to do it. But I hate talking about it. Because if I win they know I’m going to do it. If I win I would attack those oil sites that are controlled and owned by — owned. They’re controlled by ISIS. They’re taking tremendous money out.

    • jesus christ, that's barely intelligibleBuddhaHat
    • I've had more coherent conversations with a 2 year old.kona
    • A vote for Trump is a Vote for World War 3... I mean, its not even speculation. That his plan. :Dsofakingback
  • omg-11

    • You're posting this in defense of a guy who in the space of one hour asked three times why the US can't use nuclear weapons?BuddhaHat
    • http://www.slate.com…BuddhaHat
    • we have a space program ya know.omg
    • and you clearly haven't landed yet, 'cos you're still a fucking astronaut.BuddhaHat
    • lol @ yurimomfgmoldero
    • Trump supported every war that Hillary did. Only difference is he lied about it later.yuekit
    • Hillary's view on abortions and war are the same. If you don't have money, kill humans. It's a woman's choice.omg
    • Paul Watson. A fucknut in a flat cap.face_melter
    • that is the most twisted, misunderstood and ignorant interpretations behind the argument for allowing pro-choice on abortions that I've ever heard ... smhmonospaced
    • i agree. though the irony has to make you wonder about the mentality of a person willing to kill a baby and their views on war.omg
    • this is not one baby, we're talking about tons of popup shops scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those kids.omg
    • another aspect of our systematic racism doing its part.omg
    • it's when the fuck tards in religion actually have a good moral stance.omg
    • so you're projecting subjective moral standards over a woman's right to choose what to do with her body?BuddhaHat
    • how many people have died without access to proper medical insurance? without adequate medical care? we're talking about tons...BuddhaHat
    • with hospitals and insurance companies scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those poor people.BuddhaHat
    • another aspect of our systemic discrimination doing its part.BuddhaHat
    • Are you trying to compare the convenience of abortion to the needs of proper medical care? hospitals are not designed to kill. The loss of life is unwanted.omg
    • hospitals are designed to heal the sick and save lives.omg
    • "popup shops scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those kids." Do you have any idea how insane you sound when you write this?monospaced
    • having affordable healthcare is one thing, and giving out free abortions is another.omg
    • it's like you have no concept whatsoever about reality, and are just imagining the worst scenario your uninformed mind can muster ... omfgmonospaced
    • @omg, hospitals do heal the sick and save lives, and they also happen to, out of necessity, assist in death on an every day basis. Saying they don't is naive.monospaced
    • unwanted? fucking bollocks. they could lower the price of medical cover, force insurance companies to offer better coverage, that is shite.BuddhaHat
    • i agree that people should have a choice, i just don't agree that it's the right choice to make if abortion is your answer for contraception.omg
    • you can suffer an infection or an accident in Canada and live, or have the same thing happen in the US and you fucking die because you don't have the money.BuddhaHat
    • and abortion isn't a 'convenience', you don't pop down to the 7-eleven for a fucking abortion, it's a horrible, traumatising last resortBuddhaHat
    • the gray areas of assisted death is at least one made by someone in pain and is old enough to make that choice.omg
    • Your husband is an unemployed veteran with PTSD, you miss your pill 'cos you can't afford the cost, you get pregnant, you choose not to bring a life into theBuddhaHat
    • world that you can't adequately provide for, that will suffer, and they're a 'killer' for wanting an abortion? you're the monster.BuddhaHat
    • another irony moment. giving out abortions is the same as Hillary giving weapons to the Middle East and letting them kill each other.omg
    • BuddahHat, you are mentally disturbed. You're smart, but no moral values. I'm not saying you're soulless.omg
    • But "whoops, I forgot to take the pill, let's make human slushies" is pretty damning.omg
    • It's people before profits. you have to be accountable for your own actions. It's called responsibility.omg
    • yet another false equivalency. one is a milleniums-old unsolved religious and political paradox, the other is a woman's right to choose.BuddhaHat
    • Again, this is where you fail because you don't understand what Pro-Choice actually means. It means you get to choose between two. Life and no life.omg
    • 'no moral values' is again an incorrect assertion, & I didn't say forgot, I said 'can't afford even if I wanted to but the govt and insurance make it impossibleBuddhaHat
    • so you're passing the guilt onto the person that gets pregnant in a context that prohibits her from doing anything about it.BuddhaHat
    • It's people before profits. you have to be accountable for your own actions. It's called responsibility.omg
    • here's an actual equivalency for you: that's like saying 'I didn't want to get pregnant but circumstances completely out of my control prevent me from doing so'BuddhaHat
    • so how are they accountable for their own actions in the context I provided? this hypothetical person has a spouse that hasn't been adequatelyBuddhaHat
    • So the moment one becomes broke, you think it's somehow okay to kill your wife or girlfriend?omg
    • provided for by those responsible for assisting veterans, and resultingly the family has fallen upon hard times, which has left them unableBuddhaHat
    • to afford normal, every-day medications that are orders of magnitude more expensive than in other developed countriesBuddhaHat
    • Oh boo hoo BuddahHat has no money. Welfare wasn't enough for him.omg
    • and you're pointing the finger at them? You were kind enough to not accuse me of soullessness at the same time of calling me 'mentally disturbed'...BuddhaHat
    • If you apply your argument to that context, I have to ask... where's your soul? Your sense of fairness?BuddhaHat
    • you've got no morals dude. you're all about your money first.omg
    • i'm the one talking care of your baby you soulless and irresponsible fuck tard who couldn't wear a condom.omg
    • again, a robust defence, thanks omg... the only reference I have made to $$ in these comment boxes is to a hypothetical family's lack of itBuddhaHat
    • so you're pulling that assertion out of thin air, or out of your ass, it doesn't matter much which one it isBuddhaHat
    • 'couldn't wear a condom' - didn't I point out quite clearly in my hypothetical situation that they were unable to afford contraception?BuddhaHat
    • or does everyone have to go 'double-jimmy-hat-pl... to make sure that they don't suffer an unavoidable life-changing experience?BuddhaHat
    • life caring values begins grassroots. Same ones you'll see when it comes down to war.omg
    • *'double-jimmy-hat-p...BuddhaHat
    • ffs. abbreviations... double jimmy hat plus pill plus IUDBuddhaHat
    • It's how Hillary is handling the Middle East right now for her globalist agenda. She's giving out free weapons so they can all kill themselves for her profit.omg
    • intelligent life caring includes a consideration for sustainability and viability. Your approach does not.BuddhaHat
    • Which is also why I believe in free education and releasing student debt for all.omg
    • The Middle East: A humanitarian initiative kicked-off by the folks at Halliburton, led by the 'no longer self life sustaining zombie Mr Dick Cheney', circa 2001BuddhaHat
    • lol, can someone remind me how an expansive war strategy is environmentally friendly?yurimon
    • can you remind me how partnering with countries like Russia with no environmental policy whatsoever will contribute to fighting anthropogenic climate change?BuddhaHat
    • can you remind me how GOP candidates accepting money from well-known climate-denialist billionaire Koch brothers is environmentally friendly?BuddhaHat
    • how Senator Jim Inhofe, head of the Committee on climate change holding up a snowball in the Senate to deny climate change is environmentally friendly?BuddhaHat
    • Interesting topics for 2020omg
    • listen you can have meaning full conversation if you can reflect your side of the same corruption which is why trump is a threat.yurimon
    • our greatest threat right now is nuclear weapons spreading, growing etc. you wont have an environment if you keep go the wwIII route.yurimon
    • there will be war but someone as to wrap it up. if you start a war you have to win it. veitnam proved political motivated war doesnt work.yurimon
    • why are they interesting for 2020 and not now? because the current candidate thinks climate change is a conspiracy to send jobs to China?BuddhaHat
    • asking me to reflect 'my side of the same corruption' is like saying 'forget about all the gun deaths, what about the people killed by falling refrigerators?'BuddhaHat
    • it's grossly disproportionate, to the point that it doesn't justify comparisonBuddhaHat
    • we're gonna need to build that wall.omg
    • with a green new dealomg
    • morality and loss of intelligence in public school doing a good job in critical thinking. family decline and daycare is why you have butt hurtyurimon
    • again yuri, I'll direct you to the top comment of this post... that's your defence of a guy who asked why he couldn't use nukes?BuddhaHat
    • millennials from parent issues. abandonment issues lashing out as SJW with personality disorder. lol,yurimon
    • do you seriously think there's a 'wrapping it up' to nuclear war? with the number of nuclear warheads on earth right now?BuddhaHat
    • remind how being hired part time cause of obcare = a good jobyurimon
    • put daycares and schools in the great wall of Americaomg
    • 'political motivated war doesn't work' - if Russia's interference in US politics (a politically ideological war) is real, how does that stand up?BuddhaHat
    • solar power, transportation, and sustainable farming all built into the wall.omg
    • that stretches 1000 milesomg
    • In fact, in general, how does the statement 'political motivated war doesn't work' stand up? do you presume to know the desired outcomes?BuddhaHat
    • remind me how if you increase gov dependency = wealth creation. lol, fckn tits, brilliant economics policy sherlock. gets you voted in once you are hooked.yurimon
    • yuri, I'd seriously like to see your diagram that connects part time workers with Obamacare, that would be a hoot.BuddhaHat
    • this is wear BuddhaHat fails, because he doesn't care about America.omg
    • what are the desired outcomes of this war? i dont have any desire outside of peace in this world.yurimon
    • 'morality and loss of intelligence in public schools' - which side of the aisle makes more cuts in education and public funding?BuddhaHat
    • was 9/11 politically motivated?omg
    • providing a stable, supportive infrastructure to allow for growth doesn't equate to government dependency, again a false equivalency.BuddhaHat
    • And most of the wealth that's being concentrated towards the top isn't 'wealth creation', it's 'wealth redistribution'BuddhaHat
    • powered by the sun, not by governmentomg
    • Many billionaire traders are contributing very little if nothing at all to the real economy. Your politics tanked the world economy in '07-08. Nice work.BuddhaHat
    • public funding doesnt equal results. that mentality has been dead for at least 20 years. you have had you funding in rep and dem administrationsyurimon
    • although, you can also say it's powered by govtomg
    • you are looking at trillions of dollars spent on social programs, education and still the results are poor. what are going to do now? spend more $$. fuck yeahyurimon
    • 'i don't have any desire outside of peace' - you might not, but the person that you support has completely different ideas. nukes? mexicans? muslims?BuddhaHat
    • problem with 100% social programs is their lack of generating incomeomg
    • its pretty safe to assume socially policies have failed comparing to $ spent. cant blame reps for that.yurimon
    • going to space, putting jobs where they are wanted, better border control, and the safety of Americans are first priority.omg
    • public funding is dead, that's why privatisation is doing so well, it's really enhancing those worker-CEO income ratios and helping everyone equally isn't it?BuddhaHat
    • You're not going to be able to foster anything outside unless the inside is well established first.omg
    • and just think about how much cheaper and how much better higher education is these days with privatisation... we're in a veritable renaissance these days...BuddhaHat
    • social programs aren't designed to generate income directly, they're a support structure to foster the population's capacity to contributeBuddhaHat
    • Are you saying people need abortions, but they'll be able to go to an expensive private college. ok.omg
    • actually, yes, you can blame them. In every instance that they have supported cuts to funding to education you can blame them for reduced policy outcomes.BuddhaHat
    • social programs focused on the environment can generate incomes.omg
    • privatization is not free market privatization. dont confuse a gov monopoly outsourcing is going to work out or works the way the free market works.yurimon
    • getting to space is more important than making sure everyone is healthy and has a good education? and what it this shit about 'the safety of Americans'?BuddhaHat
    • its already known that its subsidies that drove prices higher.yurimon
    • might I redirect you to my comments about the medical system failing to tend to 'the safety of Americans' in a financially viable manner?BuddhaHat
    • so you're saying 'until the inside is well established', and simultaneously promoting space travel while education levels trail other developed countries?BuddhaHat
    • us has a history of throttling immigration during diff economic times. reps n dems like the cheap labor. during times of highyurimon
    • going to space should be part of the goals simultaneously driven for the future of America for both education and technology.omg
    • Solar energy doesn't just benefit government or private institutions. It benefits the middle class people.omg
    • unthrottled immigration, blacks suffer in the job market and current legal immigrant latinos as cheaper sources come in.yurimon
    • privatization is in many cases the 'free market privatization' that you espouse, so that's actually a correct equivalency that you got wrong.BuddhaHat
    • It's part of the wealth distribution, and making things cheaper, and generating income to afford social programs.omg
    • subsidies drive prices higher on lots of things. corn would be worthless without subsidies, the fossil fuel industry would be a lot less profitable too.BuddhaHat
    • Most Mexicans only want to come to America for jobs. We can provide those jobs to them, and they can stay or choose to be in America if they want.omg
    • now you have consider strain on social programs. https://youtu.be/3ey….yurimon
    • many cases not all. people can invest into solar and keep the savings. there's no reason why government can't do the sameomg
    • which is why you need the wall.omg
    • strain on social programs is only relative to tax revenues and budgets... remove tax havens or increase taxes and you'd have all costs coveredBuddhaHat
    • however you have a leaving of manufacturing sect, which wasnt as bad at the time. what jobs are people competing and what is created as job availabilityyurimon
    • remove taxes so there's money for people everywhere to invest.omg
    • keep some to afford the standard government needs in infrastructure.omg
    • the money it loses in taxes can be made up in energyomg
    • buddha the complex puzzle you are trying to solve is all been created through policy/taxes to begin with.yurimon
    • the original formula for our prosperity had a balance of gov size, taxes, once you reach todays levels you are distorting the market which will lead to collapseyurimon
    • raise minimum wage.omg
    • you two guys are full of shit, you can't meet an argument head on so you slide into something less controversial in an attempt to find a middle ground. Lame.BuddhaHat
    • allow money to come in, tax on exportation of jobsomg
    • you cant tax to prosperity. regulation benefits leads to corp regulation.yurimon
    • it's all about Americans coming together.omg
    • i hate how you have to always refresh in comments because its difficult to have a real convo on QBN.omg
    • https://www.youtube.…yurimon
    • Look at all that white space on the left of these comments. We can put a wall there, fill it with jobs and have plenty of work for art and design.omg
    • I guess if we had enough jobs here in the US, there would be no need to regulate or tax jobs going out.omg
    • oh fuck dude, this milton friedman video looks dull as shit. lolomg
    • and so much was thrown at the top, i can't filter through all this shit in thin walled comments area.omg