Politics

Out of context: Reply #21760

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,469 Responses
  • omg-11

    • You're posting this in defense of a guy who in the space of one hour asked three times why the US can't use nuclear weapons?BuddhaHat
    • http://www.slate.com…BuddhaHat
    • we have a space program ya know.omg
    • and you clearly haven't landed yet, 'cos you're still a fucking astronaut.BuddhaHat
    • lol @ yurimomfgmoldero
    • Trump supported every war that Hillary did. Only difference is he lied about it later.yuekit
    • Hillary's view on abortions and war are the same. If you don't have money, kill humans. It's a woman's choice.omg
    • Paul Watson. A fucknut in a flat cap.face_melter
    • that is the most twisted, misunderstood and ignorant interpretations behind the argument for allowing pro-choice on abortions that I've ever heard ... smhmonospaced
    • i agree. though the irony has to make you wonder about the mentality of a person willing to kill a baby and their views on war.omg
    • this is not one baby, we're talking about tons of popup shops scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those kids.omg
    • another aspect of our systematic racism doing its part.omg
    • it's when the fuck tards in religion actually have a good moral stance.omg
    • so you're projecting subjective moral standards over a woman's right to choose what to do with her body?BuddhaHat
    • how many people have died without access to proper medical insurance? without adequate medical care? we're talking about tons...BuddhaHat
    • with hospitals and insurance companies scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those poor people.BuddhaHat
    • another aspect of our systemic discrimination doing its part.BuddhaHat
    • Are you trying to compare the convenience of abortion to the needs of proper medical care? hospitals are not designed to kill. The loss of life is unwanted.omg
    • hospitals are designed to heal the sick and save lives.omg
    • "popup shops scattered throughout the nation designed to kill the shit out of those kids." Do you have any idea how insane you sound when you write this?monospaced
    • having affordable healthcare is one thing, and giving out free abortions is another.omg
    • it's like you have no concept whatsoever about reality, and are just imagining the worst scenario your uninformed mind can muster ... omfgmonospaced
    • @omg, hospitals do heal the sick and save lives, and they also happen to, out of necessity, assist in death on an every day basis. Saying they don't is naive.monospaced
    • unwanted? fucking bollocks. they could lower the price of medical cover, force insurance companies to offer better coverage, that is shite.BuddhaHat
    • i agree that people should have a choice, i just don't agree that it's the right choice to make if abortion is your answer for contraception.omg
    • you can suffer an infection or an accident in Canada and live, or have the same thing happen in the US and you fucking die because you don't have the money.BuddhaHat
    • and abortion isn't a 'convenience', you don't pop down to the 7-eleven for a fucking abortion, it's a horrible, traumatising last resortBuddhaHat
    • the gray areas of assisted death is at least one made by someone in pain and is old enough to make that choice.omg
    • Your husband is an unemployed veteran with PTSD, you miss your pill 'cos you can't afford the cost, you get pregnant, you choose not to bring a life into theBuddhaHat
    • world that you can't adequately provide for, that will suffer, and they're a 'killer' for wanting an abortion? you're the monster.BuddhaHat
    • another irony moment. giving out abortions is the same as Hillary giving weapons to the Middle East and letting them kill each other.omg
    • BuddahHat, you are mentally disturbed. You're smart, but no moral values. I'm not saying you're soulless.omg
    • But "whoops, I forgot to take the pill, let's make human slushies" is pretty damning.omg
    • It's people before profits. you have to be accountable for your own actions. It's called responsibility.omg
    • yet another false equivalency. one is a milleniums-old unsolved religious and political paradox, the other is a woman's right to choose.BuddhaHat
    • Again, this is where you fail because you don't understand what Pro-Choice actually means. It means you get to choose between two. Life and no life.omg
    • 'no moral values' is again an incorrect assertion, & I didn't say forgot, I said 'can't afford even if I wanted to but the govt and insurance make it impossibleBuddhaHat
    • so you're passing the guilt onto the person that gets pregnant in a context that prohibits her from doing anything about it.BuddhaHat
    • It's people before profits. you have to be accountable for your own actions. It's called responsibility.omg
    • here's an actual equivalency for you: that's like saying 'I didn't want to get pregnant but circumstances completely out of my control prevent me from doing so'BuddhaHat
    • so how are they accountable for their own actions in the context I provided? this hypothetical person has a spouse that hasn't been adequatelyBuddhaHat
    • So the moment one becomes broke, you think it's somehow okay to kill your wife or girlfriend?omg
    • provided for by those responsible for assisting veterans, and resultingly the family has fallen upon hard times, which has left them unableBuddhaHat
    • to afford normal, every-day medications that are orders of magnitude more expensive than in other developed countriesBuddhaHat
    • Oh boo hoo BuddahHat has no money. Welfare wasn't enough for him.omg
    • and you're pointing the finger at them? You were kind enough to not accuse me of soullessness at the same time of calling me 'mentally disturbed'...BuddhaHat
    • If you apply your argument to that context, I have to ask... where's your soul? Your sense of fairness?BuddhaHat
    • you've got no morals dude. you're all about your money first.omg
    • i'm the one talking care of your baby you soulless and irresponsible fuck tard who couldn't wear a condom.omg
    • again, a robust defence, thanks omg... the only reference I have made to $$ in these comment boxes is to a hypothetical family's lack of itBuddhaHat
    • so you're pulling that assertion out of thin air, or out of your ass, it doesn't matter much which one it isBuddhaHat
    • 'couldn't wear a condom' - didn't I point out quite clearly in my hypothetical situation that they were unable to afford contraception?BuddhaHat
    • or does everyone have to go 'double-jimmy-hat-pl... to make sure that they don't suffer an unavoidable life-changing experience?BuddhaHat
    • life caring values begins grassroots. Same ones you'll see when it comes down to war.omg
    • *'double-jimmy-hat-p...BuddhaHat
    • ffs. abbreviations... double jimmy hat plus pill plus IUDBuddhaHat
    • It's how Hillary is handling the Middle East right now for her globalist agenda. She's giving out free weapons so they can all kill themselves for her profit.omg
    • intelligent life caring includes a consideration for sustainability and viability. Your approach does not.BuddhaHat
    • Which is also why I believe in free education and releasing student debt for all.omg
    • The Middle East: A humanitarian initiative kicked-off by the folks at Halliburton, led by the 'no longer self life sustaining zombie Mr Dick Cheney', circa 2001BuddhaHat
    • lol, can someone remind me how an expansive war strategy is environmentally friendly?yurimon
    • can you remind me how partnering with countries like Russia with no environmental policy whatsoever will contribute to fighting anthropogenic climate change?BuddhaHat
    • can you remind me how GOP candidates accepting money from well-known climate-denialist billionaire Koch brothers is environmentally friendly?BuddhaHat
    • how Senator Jim Inhofe, head of the Committee on climate change holding up a snowball in the Senate to deny climate change is environmentally friendly?BuddhaHat
    • Interesting topics for 2020omg
    • listen you can have meaning full conversation if you can reflect your side of the same corruption which is why trump is a threat.yurimon
    • our greatest threat right now is nuclear weapons spreading, growing etc. you wont have an environment if you keep go the wwIII route.yurimon
    • there will be war but someone as to wrap it up. if you start a war you have to win it. veitnam proved political motivated war doesnt work.yurimon
    • why are they interesting for 2020 and not now? because the current candidate thinks climate change is a conspiracy to send jobs to China?BuddhaHat
    • asking me to reflect 'my side of the same corruption' is like saying 'forget about all the gun deaths, what about the people killed by falling refrigerators?'BuddhaHat
    • it's grossly disproportionate, to the point that it doesn't justify comparisonBuddhaHat
    • we're gonna need to build that wall.omg
    • with a green new dealomg
    • morality and loss of intelligence in public school doing a good job in critical thinking. family decline and daycare is why you have butt hurtyurimon
    • again yuri, I'll direct you to the top comment of this post... that's your defence of a guy who asked why he couldn't use nukes?BuddhaHat
    • millennials from parent issues. abandonment issues lashing out as SJW with personality disorder. lol,yurimon
    • do you seriously think there's a 'wrapping it up' to nuclear war? with the number of nuclear warheads on earth right now?BuddhaHat
    • remind how being hired part time cause of obcare = a good jobyurimon
    • put daycares and schools in the great wall of Americaomg
    • 'political motivated war doesn't work' - if Russia's interference in US politics (a politically ideological war) is real, how does that stand up?BuddhaHat
    • solar power, transportation, and sustainable farming all built into the wall.omg
    • that stretches 1000 milesomg
    • In fact, in general, how does the statement 'political motivated war doesn't work' stand up? do you presume to know the desired outcomes?BuddhaHat
    • remind me how if you increase gov dependency = wealth creation. lol, fckn tits, brilliant economics policy sherlock. gets you voted in once you are hooked.yurimon
    • yuri, I'd seriously like to see your diagram that connects part time workers with Obamacare, that would be a hoot.BuddhaHat
    • this is wear BuddhaHat fails, because he doesn't care about America.omg
    • what are the desired outcomes of this war? i dont have any desire outside of peace in this world.yurimon
    • 'morality and loss of intelligence in public schools' - which side of the aisle makes more cuts in education and public funding?BuddhaHat
    • was 9/11 politically motivated?omg
    • providing a stable, supportive infrastructure to allow for growth doesn't equate to government dependency, again a false equivalency.BuddhaHat
    • And most of the wealth that's being concentrated towards the top isn't 'wealth creation', it's 'wealth redistribution'BuddhaHat
    • powered by the sun, not by governmentomg
    • Many billionaire traders are contributing very little if nothing at all to the real economy. Your politics tanked the world economy in '07-08. Nice work.BuddhaHat
    • public funding doesnt equal results. that mentality has been dead for at least 20 years. you have had you funding in rep and dem administrationsyurimon
    • although, you can also say it's powered by govtomg
    • you are looking at trillions of dollars spent on social programs, education and still the results are poor. what are going to do now? spend more $$. fuck yeahyurimon
    • 'i don't have any desire outside of peace' - you might not, but the person that you support has completely different ideas. nukes? mexicans? muslims?BuddhaHat
    • problem with 100% social programs is their lack of generating incomeomg
    • its pretty safe to assume socially policies have failed comparing to $ spent. cant blame reps for that.yurimon
    • going to space, putting jobs where they are wanted, better border control, and the safety of Americans are first priority.omg
    • public funding is dead, that's why privatisation is doing so well, it's really enhancing those worker-CEO income ratios and helping everyone equally isn't it?BuddhaHat
    • You're not going to be able to foster anything outside unless the inside is well established first.omg
    • and just think about how much cheaper and how much better higher education is these days with privatisation... we're in a veritable renaissance these days...BuddhaHat
    • social programs aren't designed to generate income directly, they're a support structure to foster the population's capacity to contributeBuddhaHat
    • Are you saying people need abortions, but they'll be able to go to an expensive private college. ok.omg
    • actually, yes, you can blame them. In every instance that they have supported cuts to funding to education you can blame them for reduced policy outcomes.BuddhaHat
    • social programs focused on the environment can generate incomes.omg
    • privatization is not free market privatization. dont confuse a gov monopoly outsourcing is going to work out or works the way the free market works.yurimon
    • getting to space is more important than making sure everyone is healthy and has a good education? and what it this shit about 'the safety of Americans'?BuddhaHat
    • its already known that its subsidies that drove prices higher.yurimon
    • might I redirect you to my comments about the medical system failing to tend to 'the safety of Americans' in a financially viable manner?BuddhaHat
    • so you're saying 'until the inside is well established', and simultaneously promoting space travel while education levels trail other developed countries?BuddhaHat
    • us has a history of throttling immigration during diff economic times. reps n dems like the cheap labor. during times of highyurimon
    • going to space should be part of the goals simultaneously driven for the future of America for both education and technology.omg
    • Solar energy doesn't just benefit government or private institutions. It benefits the middle class people.omg
    • unthrottled immigration, blacks suffer in the job market and current legal immigrant latinos as cheaper sources come in.yurimon
    • privatization is in many cases the 'free market privatization' that you espouse, so that's actually a correct equivalency that you got wrong.BuddhaHat
    • It's part of the wealth distribution, and making things cheaper, and generating income to afford social programs.omg
    • subsidies drive prices higher on lots of things. corn would be worthless without subsidies, the fossil fuel industry would be a lot less profitable too.BuddhaHat
    • Most Mexicans only want to come to America for jobs. We can provide those jobs to them, and they can stay or choose to be in America if they want.omg
    • now you have consider strain on social programs. https://youtu.be/3ey….yurimon
    • many cases not all. people can invest into solar and keep the savings. there's no reason why government can't do the sameomg
    • which is why you need the wall.omg
    • strain on social programs is only relative to tax revenues and budgets... remove tax havens or increase taxes and you'd have all costs coveredBuddhaHat
    • however you have a leaving of manufacturing sect, which wasnt as bad at the time. what jobs are people competing and what is created as job availabilityyurimon
    • remove taxes so there's money for people everywhere to invest.omg
    • keep some to afford the standard government needs in infrastructure.omg
    • the money it loses in taxes can be made up in energyomg
    • buddha the complex puzzle you are trying to solve is all been created through policy/taxes to begin with.yurimon
    • the original formula for our prosperity had a balance of gov size, taxes, once you reach todays levels you are distorting the market which will lead to collapseyurimon
    • raise minimum wage.omg
    • you two guys are full of shit, you can't meet an argument head on so you slide into something less controversial in an attempt to find a middle ground. Lame.BuddhaHat
    • allow money to come in, tax on exportation of jobsomg
    • you cant tax to prosperity. regulation benefits leads to corp regulation.yurimon
    • it's all about Americans coming together.omg
    • i hate how you have to always refresh in comments because its difficult to have a real convo on QBN.omg
    • https://www.youtube.…yurimon
    • Look at all that white space on the left of these comments. We can put a wall there, fill it with jobs and have plenty of work for art and design.omg
    • I guess if we had enough jobs here in the US, there would be no need to regulate or tax jobs going out.omg
    • oh fuck dude, this milton friedman video looks dull as shit. lolomg
    • and so much was thrown at the top, i can't filter through all this shit in thin walled comments area.omg

View thread