Public Voice Network
- iphone apps 3737
- Made me think of this pla…
- Over 20 skateboarders 3434
- Furniture Websites 2828
- QBN Tips and tricks 3434
- QBN Late Nighters 321321
- Writer Website 44
- CMS? 2121
- RIP Greg Sher 1111
- Font critic II 5050
- Gaza 286286
- David Lee Roth 33
- _random movie stills 13381338
- TinEye 1010
- :: Ponce, PR :: To Do Lis… 99
- graphics card NOOB 11
- wtf 1212
- Pic of the Day 1113711137
- sympathy for the design i… 77
- blog 3467334673
- ffffound invite swapshop 589589
- css for specific page 33
- Comic Books ... 898898
- Official 2008-09 NHL Thre… 132132
Nikon vs Canon 2525 Responses
Last post: 4 months, 1 week ago | Thread started: Aug 27, 08, 7:29 a.m.
- Jnr_Madison
There is no correct answer.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:30 a.m. – Permalink
- nicnichols
like lvl said, go with the lenses you have.. also, the 700 is full frame, so you'd need matching lenses.. if you've already bought digi lenses, go with the D300...
..also that new D90 looks good, and shoots HD video as well


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
here... get this camera


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:40 a.m. – Permalink
- ephix
in my opinion, the lower end canon dslr is a bit low quality in the build, image quality is kinda good. the opposite is true for nikon. when you get more high end, it's different. also nikon seems to be more expensive, probably why the build quality is better.


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:40 a.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
here... get this camera


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
sorry bout that last post...


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- MIJA
Some stores here will alllow you to rent the camera for a day and subtract the rental price from the product if you decide to buy it. I'd recommend trying this if you don't have much experience with either.
I've been a Nikon user for years but they really fell behind in the digital landscape. With the releases of their newer cameras they are finally competitive again.


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 1:46 p.m. – Permalink



