Logo of the Day
Logo of the Day
- Started 17 years ago
- Last post 9 days ago
- 888 Responses
- imbecile5
- pardon my ignorance, but is this for real how they used to do those graphics?sarahfailin
- Yep. Imagine the joy of telling the client how much a change might cost them. Doesn't pop? Fuck off!MrT
- Amazing********
- this was one of my favorite sequences growing up ... I still remember the music, and the town flyover ... epic!monospaced
- dopemoldero
- https://www.youtube.…moldero
- awesomearne
- excellent postSunSunSun_
- sted0
- sarahfailin1
the history of the COEXIST logo, who created it and who stole it
- zarkonite1
Ad Age logo redesigns:
1930:
1950:
1970:
1980:
1990:
2017:
I'm down with 1930 and 1990 personally.
- 1990utopian
- to be honest they're all pretty shittyPonyBoy
- nice use of original g - I like it (latest) and 90.fadein11
- 2020: Adge********
- 2030: Vadgedbloc
- 1990milfhunter
- 1990. 2017 is ok but the 'd' looks out of place slightlySunSunSun_
- 2017 looks more 1970canoe
- full circlesarahfailin
- Gnash1
73-year-old Tom Bookwalter designed Kansas State University’s athletics logo in 1988, which is still in use but is the least remarkable part of the story. THIS is: “The Powercat will remain Bookwalter’s property until 70 years after his death.
He assigned the copyright to K-State, and is paid about 7 percent of all money K-State gets from its use.” Boss.
- according to the linked article, the university received $1.4 million in royalties last year.Gnash
- that means he goy around %100K in royalties last yearGnash
- *gotGnash
- was never a fan of this logo, could use some refining at the very least, but good for him, which more designers got deals like this_niko
- ya, good for him. I have a few licensing deals (5%) for few bands. none of them took off, unfortunately. I still get small cheques annually, thoughGnash
- WTF is that supposed to be??Hayzilla
- duh. it's a cat with power!Gnash
- upvote for profitimbecile
- I'm with hayzilla — literally what the fuck am I looking at? It's.. beyond awful.detritus
- OH! I see it now.
ffs, that's terrible.
Good for him though!detritus - can't see a cat? either getting old, never understood design, or hater? take your pick.imbecile
- to be clear -- I didn't post it because it's a great logo. It's the 7% royalties until 70 years after he's dead! damn well played, TomGnash
- No, imbecile, i literally couldn't deconstruct what I was looking at here. It was a wholly random series of shapes to me at first.detritus
- And now that I see it, it's shit.detritus
- Kinda like that dress the other year, I guess.detritus
- chukkaphob2
- I'm #Firefox4Lyfe but i literally don't give a shit.detritus
- "literally?"
do you literally know the meaning of the word "literally?"chukkaphob - quite nice. I like how vibrant the new colors are. the purple though on it's back... i don't think its needed.kona
- I'm with kona, I like it without the purple.Maaku
- Foxfire.MrT
- Huh, looks so similar I would never have noticed.formed
- https://pe-images.s3…dbloc
- Why did they add a flat earth variant?SimonFFM
- lol
https://uploads.disq…dbloc - Vaporwave ℠sureshot
- chukka, this'll blow your mind..
https://en.oxforddic… - 1.1 informal, Used for emphasis while not being literally true.detritus - y tho? Old logo is fine. New one is fine too. Except that purple on the edge. Looks worse, the smaller it gets.section_014
- Mozilla waste far too much time rebranding themselves, pointlessly and often quite badly. It's their Thing.detritus
- @detrius this will literally make you laugh: https://www.youtube.…chukkaphob
- But, I am actually literally not giving a shit?detritus
- They added that to the dictionary, well fuck me. You can't use literally in the non literal sense, that's the EXACT opposite of what the word means********
- fucking americans********
- next they'll suggest there/they're/their are interchangeable. We're fucked.********
- ^ yes, we're literally fucked.chukkaphob
- ok_not_ok-2
- what the hell was the point of that? essentially the same as before, but thinner.hans_glib
- the agancy's website is fuckin unusable!
It pissed me off!
www.rosedesign.co.uk…nbq - *agencynbq
- milfhunter5
- unimaginative derivative tired clichéhans_glib
- some parts i like for example the helmet prints. But i think the logo will not work on digital platforms where you should think about responsiveness etc.milfhunter
- I used to work for the agency who did the previous F1 logo. This new logo on first sight looked like an "A" or "FI", and I also agree with both comments above.matski
- it's shit
(view expressed as a 30yr+ F1 & Ferrari fan)Bluejam - I don't even know what I'm looking at, but whatever it is, it does seem dated.MondoMorphic
- I don't hate it. And I don't watch F1.stoplying
- Loving it. Totally reminds me of probably all racing games made for consoles. Custom typefaces are also a nice touch although I don't get the E in F1 Turbo.rabattski
- I like it. I'm aware any new logo by anyone for anyone will get 90% negative criticism at first.CyBrainX
- It's good. And works well in applications. Lets see it next year in use, because fancy mockups are always a bit misleading.tank02
- Brett Brashutopian
- God, you are a bunch of hateful, petty and envious people. I think it looks great, esp. in action. Crying about responsiveness, jeezuz what is wrong with you?mekk
- You wedding card designers think you have to give your stupid opinion on everything, don't ya?mekk
- It's not so much that I hate it, it's that I really, really liked the previous one and didn't feel like it needed updating. But I do kinda hate it tho hahaSteveJobs
- Btw, I follow F1 and watch every qualifying and race session including build-up and post-quali/race commentary, so not just a casual complainer.SteveJobs
- sry 4 my rant, luv you all but we all need to be a little less of a designer cunt when reviewing our colleague's work.mekk
- found this on the net ...
"The logo with a proper racing line."
https://i.redd.it/rr…Bluejam - I dig it. Although as someone who races bikes I hate what F1 does to the tracks. (The hard braking in corners makes ripples in the track surface)GM278
- I like it.cannonball1978
- Looks like it's been designed by the same people that have made the sport unwatchable since 1997.see_thru
- Funny...if you think that the logo looks like shit...which it does, we are envious.utopian
- I like it. They have definitely been looking at the past work of the designers republic though.Bullitt
- I don't give a shit about racing. But great improvement on the old one for sure.Miguex
- I thought of D Trumpdrgs
- I think we all think about trumpster, not related to this logo though hahaMiguex
- Are the new kids they're trying to attract still into Wipeout? It feels about 15yrs off. And that display face does *not* work well for the broadcast graphics.Nathan_Adams
- better than the last one. still shit. I didn't do anything better either.********
- like it. reminds of wipeout.inteliboy
- It's bad ass. I'm all for it. Looks sick in use too.sofakingback
- @mekk welcome to qbn. go fuck yourself if you don't like to discuss designmilfhunter
- I like it.i_monk
- Can't decide if I hate it or dig it, but I do know that I'll never contact w+k for a design job.ArchitectofFate
- Says one that calls himself "milfhunter", member since 2015mekk
- @mekk What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals...milfhunter
- @mekk ive been lurking this place since 2009. and that doesn't make a designer with a opinion more special.milfhunter
- I graduated top of my class in the Design Sealz. Probably not the same thing... but brothers! amirite??? guise????sofakingback
- I graduated in the same class as Seal.Hayzilla
- I like it. Although would prefer something to make it more identifiable as a 1 not an I.Hayzilla
- I like it..********
- As a designer I can't help but give my opinion that the weight of the gaps inbetween should be slightly heavier... But I like it********
- This is trash, and F1 is so boring now that I can't even watch it. MotoGP or touring cars.section_014
- Watching people drive in a circle is boring no matter the brand.i_monk
- Gnash2
HOT & READY LOGOS FOR SALE
VOL. 2
Current price for any logo: $350
Price increases by $15 with each logo sold.
- Easier to copy and paste.utopian
- Are these your logos Gnash?utopian
- nope.
popped up on my twitter feed.Gnash - interesting biz model. not a bad way to get rid of those doodles we all do.Gnash
- I was hoping for a pizzadbloc
- the logos are decent, and yes...a very interesting business model.utopian
- ^ +1Gnash
- last round sold out, not a bad haul - over $7KGnash
- This dude.
https://desandro.com…dbloc - ^ that's super usefulGnash
- looks like he as done some quality js as welldbloc
- Interesting. They key would be promoting it.Chimp
- sofas-1
"NAMON is a personal Logo/Monogram based on your name.
The design symbolizes your identity, aspirations and favorites."The pic isn't related to the logos, but it's from the sites blog and l thought you guys might like it
- imbecile-8
- they should have used this...
https://imgur.com/ki…fooler - lol ^MHDC
- ha!sofakingback
- lol yup exactly_niko
- christ, well it's an enormous improvement at least.sarahfailin
- downvoted even though you all knew why i posted it? tough crowdimbecile
- Maybe that's why you got downvoted haha********
- I think the old one is amazing********
- i got downvoted because your logo is similar to this from october? tough crowd.imbecile
- Eh?********
- they should have used this...
- i_monk2
And the headline-grabbing alt logo:
- utopian-2
- Gnash7
- https://www.itsnicet…Gnash
- I like itFax_Benson
- WTF. This is just the worst.MondoMorphic
- That's hilarious********
- more flash then substance, imodesmo
- Saved by the BellDRIFTMONKEY
- I like it. Could make some good animated versions too. Referencing Kandinsky?PhanLo
- that little detached square on the left is the crimean peninsula http://ontheworldmap…sarahfailin
- it's nice thatMilan
- the application is fun.Gnash
- def Saved by the BellRamanisky2
- nice logo, preppy!PonyBoy
- looks like a toddler dropped all his toysdbloc
- https://assets.itsni…dbloc
- @dbloc did you just assume the toddler's gender?chukkaphob
- looks like an 80s music video nightmareGuyFawkes
- a birds eye view of kitchen utensilspinkfloyd
- I like it. Brutalist style. Technically it is a bad logo thoughCalderone2000
- Did RUSSIA need a logo?microkorg
- el lissitsky is turning in his gravehans_glib
- cuntstructivistkingsteven
- i think the term is suprematismdrgs
- Wtfnotype
- https://www.undercon…********
- applications are superb. Just v.odd alone.fadein11
- brave and suiting. why so much negativity here?SimonFFM
- I absolutely love it, and love its application design. If you hate the colors, its application usages is far greater than just the application.ElephantMark
- ^ yupGnash
- Yeah the clipped imagery in the shapes works super nice. I like the extreme kerning too.robthelad
- To the above, whom said its technically bad as a logo. Not really a brand mark is about memorability the shape becomes memorable, and in a similar way as Nike'sElephantMark
- suprematism, man. kandinsky, el lissitzky, et al.doesnotexist
- I think (hope) everyone knows what it refers to.fadein11
- Very Russian. Says "Soviet era" all over it, Y'all mad because you didn't think about it :)Maaku
- Very fittingpango
- Fitting yet terrible.garbage
- (i think most do, fadein)Gnash
- I like it.cannonball1978
- most yes but not all it seemsfadein11
- love itsinjun
