Public Voice Network
- What are you listening to… 892892
- water marks on letterhead…
- blog 3027330273
- serif fonts 55
- Volume One 1616
- QBN Spam Report 2020
- EC: Anthony Lister 66
- Cannonball's Classica… 22
- skulls 4747
- Ignore button please. 2525
- party @ simonyi's 11
- New XBox Live 4949
- FMT 112108 3131
- For a better tomorrow 2121
- FFFind me a FFFound 33
- What printer should i buy… 11
- New Bond "Quantum of… 7777
- EC: Joe Wigdahl 2828
- Portfolio online 1818
- thread killer 22082208
- Batesoling was fun 1111
- 10 Greatest Thinkers 121121
- Australia! 2525
- Your Christmas List 2525
Anyone else thing getty killed istock? 1111 Responses
Last post: 3 months, 4 weeks ago | Thread started: Jul 25, 08, 11:39 a.m.
- Iggyboo
Anyone else agree that istock has become too costly for its members and getty went over board and made it really expensive? If I was a photographer I'd be kinda upset at the rates too.. Istock used to be the lower end now its trying to make itself the bridge between getty and the lower end. I will still use it for vector but even that is becoming too expensive..
- Jul 25, 08, 11:39 a.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
what a bunch of bastards…


- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:46 a.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
Getty is the Wal-Mart of stock photography

- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:47 a.m. – Permalink
- marcostill
20 dollars for a 11x17 high res photo is real expensive?

- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:49 a.m. – Permalink
- Iggyboo
Last year I bought 100 credits for like 60 dollars with a coupon. and I would get about 3 credits to a 5mb image and the licensing was good for 250k repeats of use. Now the licensing is changed the average image costs 10 credits or 12.50$ usd for a damn photo and... the licensing is all screwy because it looks like getty has gotten in there and reduced reprintability on some of the photos. You gotta read the fine print. And the vector rules changed making it alot more prohibitive to use vector in or as a logo etc.


- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:52 a.m. – Permalink
- robotron3k
getty in getting massacred by fickr.com some of the worlds greatest, high resolution free photos!!! i worked at a fancy pants design shop in NY with a huge account and they told all the designers, "need an image, steal one from flickr"


- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:55 a.m. – Permalink
- Iggyboo
Yea I worked at a big agency too. and its up to the designers to stop that shit. Because honestly It's not right to the photographers. That being said you should go out of your way to flickr and find those photographers and negotiate rates for specific images. That's much better than using getty and you can generally get them for a more affordable price then getty. and better terms.


- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:57 a.m. – Permalink
- marcostill
everything go up in price. still much cheaper then big stock companies. you sound sad.

- Dog-earJul 25, 08, 11:59 a.m. – Permalink

